Vineet Chaudhri v. R.K. Dawar and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 15 Jan 2015 · 2015:DHC:407
Hima Kohli
IPA 1/2015
2015:DHC:407
other petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to comply with procedural objections and failure to appear.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
IPA 1/2015 and I.A. 204-206/2015
Date of Decision: 15.01.2015 IN THE MATTER OF
VINEET CHAUDHRI ..... Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
R.K. DAWAR AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: None
CORAM
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J. (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. The present petition was renotifed on 09.01.2015 as none was present on behalf of the petitioner. Same is the position today.

2. A perusal of the paper book reveals that the present petition was filed as long back as on 24.01.2012, whereafter it was returned by the Registry under objections on several occasions and it was re-filed from time to time. The petition was finally re-filed on 03.11.2014 and yet again, the Registry had pointed out certain defects and the petitioner was called to meet the concerned officer, but the objections have remained pending. The petition has been listed with the objections raised by the Registry.

3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution alongwith the pending application.

JUDGE JANUARY 15, 2015