Full Text
Translation output
$-27 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 9305/2014 & CMNos.21092/2014 & 234/2015 & Crl. M.A.
337/2015 UNION OF INDIA & ANR Petitioners
Through Mr. Shanker Raju, Adv.
W.P.(C) 9305/2014 & CMNos.21092/2014 & 234/2015 & Crl. M.A.
337/2015 UNION OF INDIA & ANR Petitioners
Through Mr. Shanker Raju, Adv.
VERSUS
ASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL Respondent
Through Mr.Rakesh K. Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Gupta & Ms. ShefaliJain, Advs.
Through Mr.Rakesh K. Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Gupta & Ms. ShefaliJain, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LS.MEHTA
12.01.2015 Mr. Shanker Raju, on instructions from the petitioner No.2 - Central
Board of Direct Taxes seeks to withdraw the present petition. Counsel further submits that the petitioner No.2 has taken a decision to post the respondent on some non-sensitive post in Delhi for his tenure as per the transfer policy.
Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Advocate appearing for the respondent, on the other hand, submits that he has instructions not to press Crl.
M.A.
No.337/2015 moved under Section 340 Cr.P.C. for the time being. Counsel further submits that in future if any kind of vindictive action is taken by the petitioners against the respondent then the respondent may take the help of
2015:DHC:11808-DB v.f the averments made in the petition to reflect the conduct ofthe petitioners.
The writ petition and all the pending applications are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Let the respondent be accordingly posted to some non-sensitive post in Delhi under the relevant guidelines.
KAILASH GAMBHIR, J JANUARY 12, 2015 km 2015:DHC:11808-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LS.MEHTA
12.01.2015 Mr. Shanker Raju, on instructions from the petitioner No.2 - Central
Board of Direct Taxes seeks to withdraw the present petition. Counsel further submits that the petitioner No.2 has taken a decision to post the respondent on some non-sensitive post in Delhi for his tenure as per the transfer policy.
Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Advocate appearing for the respondent, on the other hand, submits that he has instructions not to press Crl.
M.A.
No.337/2015 moved under Section 340 Cr.P.C. for the time being. Counsel further submits that in future if any kind of vindictive action is taken by the petitioners against the respondent then the respondent may take the help of
2015:DHC:11808-DB v.f the averments made in the petition to reflect the conduct ofthe petitioners.
The writ petition and all the pending applications are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Let the respondent be accordingly posted to some non-sensitive post in Delhi under the relevant guidelines.
KAILASH GAMBHIR, J JANUARY 12, 2015 km 2015:DHC:11808-DB
JUDGMENT