Full Text
Translation output
$35 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 70/2014 & CM No. 11023/2014
DINESH AGGARWAL Appellant
Through: Mr. J.S. Bakshi with Mr. A.S. Bakshi, Advocates along with appellant in person.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 70/2014 & CM No. 11023/2014
DINESH AGGARWAL Appellant
Through: Mr. J.S. Bakshi with Mr. A.S. Bakshi, Advocates along with appellant in person.
VERSUS
RASHMI AGGARWAL Respondent
Through: Mr. Anil Goel, Advocate along with respondent in person.
Through: Mr. Anil Goel, Advocate along with respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
22.01.2015 The matter has been settled between the parties by the intervention of Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
A settlement agreement dated 19.1.2015 incorporating all the terms of settlement have been duly signed and executed by both the parties before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
Both the parties are present in court and state that they have agreed to the terms of the settlement agreement out of their own will, choice and volition, without there being any sort of pressure or coercion upon them. The settlement agreement which was signed and executed before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation
Centre is proved on record as Ex.A. Both the parties shall remain bound by each and every term of the settlement and in no
2015:DHC:11653-DB / circumstance they will deviate therefrom.
In terms of the said settlement agreement, both the parties have agreed that the custody of the minor child Manhan shall remain with the wife and first party shall be free to visit the minor child once every month. The parties have agreed that the said settlement arrived at between them is in the interest of the minor child Manhan. The parties pray that leave be granted in terms of Order XXXII Rule 7
CPC for entering into the said settlement agreement for which they have taken a conscious decision that the terms of the settlement arrived at between them are in the interest of the minor child.
In view of above, leave is granted. The present appeal filed by the appellant is accordingly disposed of in terms of settlement agreement Ex.A.
A copy of the order be given dasti to both the parties.
ILASHIR, J JANUARY 22, 2015 srb 2015:DHC:11653-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
22.01.2015 The matter has been settled between the parties by the intervention of Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
A settlement agreement dated 19.1.2015 incorporating all the terms of settlement have been duly signed and executed by both the parties before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
Both the parties are present in court and state that they have agreed to the terms of the settlement agreement out of their own will, choice and volition, without there being any sort of pressure or coercion upon them. The settlement agreement which was signed and executed before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation
Centre is proved on record as Ex.A. Both the parties shall remain bound by each and every term of the settlement and in no
2015:DHC:11653-DB / circumstance they will deviate therefrom.
In terms of the said settlement agreement, both the parties have agreed that the custody of the minor child Manhan shall remain with the wife and first party shall be free to visit the minor child once every month. The parties have agreed that the said settlement arrived at between them is in the interest of the minor child Manhan. The parties pray that leave be granted in terms of Order XXXII Rule 7
CPC for entering into the said settlement agreement for which they have taken a conscious decision that the terms of the settlement arrived at between them are in the interest of the minor child.
In view of above, leave is granted. The present appeal filed by the appellant is accordingly disposed of in terms of settlement agreement Ex.A.
A copy of the order be given dasti to both the parties.
ILASHIR, J JANUARY 22, 2015 srb 2015:DHC:11653-DB
JUDGMENT