Full Text
Translation output
$-3 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 2562/2014
JITOO
Petitioner
Through:Mr.Ajay Thakur, Advocate
W.P.(CRL) 2562/2014
JITOO
Petitioner
Through:Mr.Ajay Thakur, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE (GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents
Through:Mr.SaIeem Ahmed, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State with Ms.Cham Dalai, and Mr.Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates with
I.O. Inspector Rakesh Kumar, P.S. Aman Vihar.
Mr.Ankur Gupta, Advocate for Neelam.
Through:Mr.SaIeem Ahmed, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State with Ms.Cham Dalai, and Mr.Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates with
I.O. Inspector Rakesh Kumar, P.S. Aman Vihar.
Mr.Ankur Gupta, Advocate for Neelam.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
06.02.2015 Petitioner seeks writ of Habeas Corpus for production of his wife Neelam from the illegal custody ofherparents.
Notice was issued in the matter. We have heard the counsel for the parties and the parties in the chambef. Neelam as well as her parents submit that no marriage was solemnised between the petitioner and Neelam. The father, mother and
Neelam submit that they have entered into an amicable settlement with the petitioner and his family. As per the settlement, it has been agreed that the petitioner will not press this petition and Neelam and her parents will not press the FIR
2015:DHC:11624-DB <v registered at their instance and co-operate in quashing of the
FIR. Resultantly, the present petition is dismissed, as not pressed.
Parties agree to remain bound by the terms of settlement and statement made in the Court today.
G.S.SISTANI, J FEBRUARY 06, 2015 ks SANGITA'UHINGRA SEHGAL, J
2015:DHC:11624-DB
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
06.02.2015 Petitioner seeks writ of Habeas Corpus for production of his wife Neelam from the illegal custody ofherparents.
Notice was issued in the matter. We have heard the counsel for the parties and the parties in the chambef. Neelam as well as her parents submit that no marriage was solemnised between the petitioner and Neelam. The father, mother and
Neelam submit that they have entered into an amicable settlement with the petitioner and his family. As per the settlement, it has been agreed that the petitioner will not press this petition and Neelam and her parents will not press the FIR
2015:DHC:11624-DB <v registered at their instance and co-operate in quashing of the
FIR. Resultantly, the present petition is dismissed, as not pressed.
Parties agree to remain bound by the terms of settlement and statement made in the Court today.
G.S.SISTANI, J FEBRUARY 06, 2015 ks SANGITA'UHINGRA SEHGAL, J
2015:DHC:11624-DB
JUDGMENT