Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 7815/2014& CM 18346/2014 (stay)
RAYMOND SHEHRIAZ KANE Petitioner
Through Mr. Vikas Aggarwal, Advocate
Through Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Advocate with Ms. Ratna D. Dhingra, Ms. Bhavna Dhami, Advocates
BINAY DIMRI Petitioner
Through Mr. Anshu Mahajan, Advocate
Through Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Advocate with Ms. Ratna D. Dhingra, Ms. Bhavna Dhami, Advocates
06.02.2015
ORDER
1. These writ petitions are disposed of with the consent order that the writ petitions are not pressed on merits but all aspects on merits whether of facts and law or any other issue, as raised in these writ petitions or raised before the departmental proceedings, can be raised by the petitioners before fF.P.(C) 7815/2014 &W.P.(C) 7814/2014 page 1of[2] 2015:DHC:11565 / the Disciplinary Authority and which DiscipUnary Authority will after hearing the parties pass a speaking order in accordance with law. It is further made clear that in case petitioners want to file an additional reply to the show cause notice given by the Disciplinary Authority, petitioners can now do so within a period oftwo weeks, as prayed.
2. Writ petitions are accordingly disposedof, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
FEBRUARY 06,2015 godara VALMIKIJ. MEHTA,J