Preetikalra & Ors. v. State

Delhi High Court · 11 Feb 2015 · 2015:DHC:11220
Sunita Gupta
CRL.REV.P. 68/2012
2015:DHC:11220
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed criminal revision petitions in default due to petitioners' failure to appear and prosecute their cases.

Full Text
Translation output
$-24,25 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.REV.P. 68/2012 &Crl.M.A.No.1754/2012
PREETIKALRA &QRS. p \ , Petitioners
Through: None.
VERSUS
STATE
, Respondent
Through: Mr.Q.P.Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with ACP
Ved Prakash, Operation/Outer.
CRL.REV.P. 186/2012 &Crl.M.A.Nos. 4228-31/2012
AMRIK SINGH ^ . .
T,, , Petitioner
Through: None.
VERSUS
STATE
T,, , , Respondent
Through: Mr.Q.P.Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with ACP
CORAM- Prakash, Operation/Outer.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA
11.02.2015 None has appeared for the petitioners despite pass over. Even on the last date ofhearing, none had appeared for the petitioners. It seems that petitioners are not interested in pursuing the petitions. The same are dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
FEBRUARY 11,2015 SUNITA GUPTA, J mb 2015:DHC:11220
JUDGMENT