Rakesh Kumar Jain v. Aezinfratechpvt Ltd & Ors

Delhi High Court · 18 Feb 2015 · 2015:DHC:11981
Vipin Sanghi
CRL.L.P.Nos.79-80/2014
2015:DHC:11981
other appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the criminal leave petitions in default due to the petitioner's non-appearance and a settlement between the parties leading to withdrawal.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.L.P.Nos.79-80/2014 RAKESH KUMAR JAIN(HUP) Petitioner
Through: None.
VERSUS
AEZINFRATECHPVT LTD & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Sacchin Puri & Ms. Monica Manchanda,Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
18.02.2015 Despite pass-over, none has appeared for the petitioner. On the last date as well,none appeared forthe petitioner even after a pass-over.
Learned counsel for the respondent had stated that a settlement has been reached between the parties, and under the settlement, the petitioner has undertaken to withdraw these petitions.
It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing these petitions. They are,accordingly,dismissed in default.
VIPIN SANGHI,J FEBRUARY 18,2015 B.S. Rokella 2015:DHC:11981
JUDGMENT