Amar Singh & Anr. v. Anil Goswami & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 26 Feb 2015
Suresh Kait
CONT.CAS(C) 857/2014; CONT.CAS(C) 858/2014; CONT.CAS(C) 9/2015
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted respondents eight weeks to comply with earlier orders to grant benefits to petitioners, imposing a monthly penalty for non-compliance and allowing revival of petitions if aggrieved.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C) 857/2014
CONT.CAS(C) 858/2014
CONT.CAS(C) 9/2015
AMAR SINGH & ANR.
Petitioners In CONT.CAS(C) 857/2014 NATHMAL VERMA & ANR.
Petitioners In CONT.CAS(C) 858/2014 RAMESH CHAND & ORS. Petitioners
In CONT.CAS(C) 9/2015 Represented by: Mr. Ankur Chibber and
Ms. Aakriti Jain, Advs.
VERSUS
ANIL GOSWAMI & ORS Respondents Represented by: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Apurva Verma, Adv. for R1 in
Cont.Cas (C) 857/2014 with Mr. S.S. Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF.
Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sajiv Kr. Saxena and Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Advs. in Cont. Cas (C)
858/2014.
Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Adv. for R1 to R3 in Cont.
Cas (C) 9/2015.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
26.02.2015
ORDER

1. Pursuant to orders dated 15,07.2014 and 29.05.2014 passed in W.P.(C) 4282/2014 and W.P.(C) 3661/2014 respectively and order dated 2015:DHC:10850 02.12.2014 passed by this Court in the above petitions and order dated 12.09.2014 passed in 6055/2014, respondents have filed compHance report whereby stated that the aforesaid orders have been complied with.

2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents further seeks 8 weeks time to grant the benefits to the petitioners as per MHA/UO dated 16.02.2015 on delayed payment.

3. In view of the averments made in the reply filed by the respondents, they are directed grant the benefits to the petitioners within 8 weeks from today. Failing which, respondents shall pay Rs.25,000/- per month to each ofthe petitioners.

4. If the petitioners are still aggrieved with the decision of the respondents, liberty is granted to them to revive the present petitions.

5. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of.

FEBRUARY 26,2015 Jg SURESHKAIT,J