Full Text
Translation output
u $--2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI Bail Appl. 154/2014
SANDEEP
Petitioner
Through : Mr.T.S.Varun with Mr.B.P.Sharma and
Ms.Archana Sharma, Advocates.
SANDEEP
Petitioner
Through : Mr.T.S.Varun with Mr.B.P.Sharma and
Ms.Archana Sharma, Advocates.
VERSUS
STATE
Respondent
Through : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP.
Mr.R.D.Maurya, Advocate for the complainant.
Respondent
Through : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP.
Mr.R.D.Maurya, Advocate for the complainant.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
09.03.2015 Status report not filed.
The petitioner is in custody since 31.07.2009. The prosecution failed to complete its evidence despite various opportunities granted.
The prosecution case is based upon circumstantial evidence. Dead body of the deceased could not be recovered. PW-6 (Avdhesh
Yadav) and PW-7 (Neeraj Dalmia) have not supported the prosecution and have turned hostile. After getting instructions from the Investigating Officer, the learned APP states that all material public witnesses have since been examined. Onlyfew official
BailAppl. 154/2014 Page 1 of2 2015:DHC:10588 witnesses remained to be examined. The petitioner was earlier granted interim bail and there are no allegations of its misuse.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is admitted to bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of ^l,00,000/-with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction ofthe Trial Court.
The application stands disposed of Trial Court record (if any) along with a copy of this order be sent back forthwith.
«fP.GARG, J.
MARCH 09,2015 sa Bail Appl. 154/2014 Page 2 of2
2015:DHC:10588
09.03.2015 Status report not filed.
The petitioner is in custody since 31.07.2009. The prosecution failed to complete its evidence despite various opportunities granted.
The prosecution case is based upon circumstantial evidence. Dead body of the deceased could not be recovered. PW-6 (Avdhesh
Yadav) and PW-7 (Neeraj Dalmia) have not supported the prosecution and have turned hostile. After getting instructions from the Investigating Officer, the learned APP states that all material public witnesses have since been examined. Onlyfew official
BailAppl. 154/2014 Page 1 of2 2015:DHC:10588 witnesses remained to be examined. The petitioner was earlier granted interim bail and there are no allegations of its misuse.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is admitted to bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of ^l,00,000/-with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction ofthe Trial Court.
The application stands disposed of Trial Court record (if any) along with a copy of this order be sent back forthwith.
«fP.GARG, J.
MARCH 09,2015 sa Bail Appl. 154/2014 Page 2 of2
2015:DHC:10588
JUDGMENT