Geeta Dhull v. Director of Education & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 04 Mar 2015 · 2015:DHC:11332
Valmiki J. Mehta
W.P.(C) 2131/2015
2015:DHC:11332
administrative other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court declined to grant higher suspension allowance at this stage but allowed petitioners to seek it upon success in related writ petitions.

Full Text
Translation output
19 and 23
* IN THE fflGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 2131/2015 and C.M.No.3835/2015
GEETA DHULL Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anil Sehgal, Advocate.
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION &ORS Respondents
Through: Ms. Nikhita Khetrapal, Advocate for respondent No.1.
+ W.P.(C) 2152/2015 and C.M. No.3865/2015
KESHAB KUMAR CHETRI Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anil Sehgal, Advocate.
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION &ORS Respondents
Through: Ms. Nikhita Khetrapal, Advocate for respondent No.1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA o/o 04.03.2015
After arguments, both these writ petitions are not pressed, at this stage, with liberty to the petitioners to seek higher suspension allowance in case petitioners succeed in their wnt petitions being W.P.(C)
Nos.5568/2014 and 5577/2014.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
MARCH 04,2015/Ne
2015:DHC:11332
JUDGMENT