Raj Kumar v. Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Co. Education Secondary School

Delhi High Court · 04 Mar 2015 · 2015:DHC:11306
Valmiki J. Mehta
W.P.(C) 1706/2013
2015:DHC:11306
labor petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions directing payment of full salary to employees for specified periods without interest or costs, disposing the matter on consent.

Full Text
Translation output
r' t\A HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 1706/2013
RAJ KUMAR Petitioner
Through; Mr. Ashok Agarwal and Ms. Nisha Tomar, Advs.
VERSUS
SHAHEED UDHAM SINGH SMARAK CO. EDUCATION SECONDARY SCHOOL
AND ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. B.B.Gupta and Mr. Somyam Khetarpal, Adv. for R1 & 2.
W.P.(C) 1865/2013
VINITA GAUR ••••• Petitioner
Through; Mr. Ashok Agarwal and Ms. Nisha Tomar, Advs.
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION ANDANR Respondents
Through; Ms. Zubeda Begum, standing counsel of
GNCTDforDOE.
Mr. B.B.Gupta and Mr. Somyam Khetarpal, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA
ORDER o/„ 04.03.2015
JUDGMENT

1. After arguments, these petitions are disposed of with the consent order that in W.P.(C) No. 1706/2013 the petitioner Sh. Raj Kumar will be paid 100% salary by the respondent no.1-school for the period for which petitioner Sh. Raj Kumar has worked from 17.1.2012 to 1.11.2014 W.P.(C) 1706/2013 &1865/13 P^Se 1of[2] 2015:DHC:11306 and in W.P.(C) No. 1865/2013 the petitioner Smt.Vinita Gaur will similarly get the payment for the period from 16.1.2012 to 11.11.2014. These payments be made to the petitioners within a period of four weeks from today. It is specifically agreed that these petitioners will not be entitled to any interest for delayed payment and for costs.

2. I may clarify that the aforesaid dates are given to me by the counsel for the petitioners.

3. The writ petitions are accordingly allowed and disposed ofin terms ofthe aforesaid order.