Modern Institute of Teachers Education v. Juglal Singh & Ors

1. Exemption allowed, subject to alljust exceptions.

2. Applications standdisposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 92/2015, CONT. CASrC) 93/2015, CONT. CASrCI 101/2015, CONT. CAS(C) 102/2015. CONT. CAS(C) 142/2015, CONT. eAS(C) 149/2015, CONT. CAS(C[1] 150/2015 & CONT. CASrC^ 151/2015

1. Vide the present petitions, the petitioners seek directions, whereby, contempt proceedings be initiated against the respondents for intentional and deliberate breach and non-compliance of order dated 24^^ November, 2014 passed by this Courtin W.P. (C)No. 7596/2013.

2. I hereby make it clear that the orders on different dates were passed in different writ petitions, however, contents of the order remain same as under:- "Keeping in view the aforesaid as well as the judgment/orders of the Madhya Pradesh and Punjab & Haryana High Courts as well as the order dated 10^'^ September, 2013 passed by Supreme Court i SLP No. 4247-4248/2009, present writ petitions are disposed of with a direction that the petitioners shall apply afresh in accordance with new regulations if required and the same shall be considered by the NCTE/NRC for the year 2015-16 in accordance with new regulations which are to benotified in compliance with the directions of the Supreme Court. If any deficiency is found, the same shall be communicated to the petitioners, who shall remove the deficiency within the given time. In case, the deficiencies are removed within the given time, the application shall be processed in accordance with Rules and Regulations. If the deficiencies are not removed, the applications shall stand rejected. With the aforesaid observations, the present batch of writ petitions is disposedofbut withoutany order as to costs."

3. Accordingly, the respondent/NCTE issued new Regulations on 1'^ December, 2014. The petitions were disposed of with the directions that the petitioners shall apply afresh inaccordance with new regulations, if required and the same shall be considered bythe NCTE/NRC for theyear 2015-16 in accordance with new regulations. It is further directed that if any deficiency is found, the same shall be communicated to the petitioners who shall remove the deficiency within the given time. In case, the deficiencies are removed within the given time, the application shall be processed in accordance with Rules and Regulations.

4. Accordingly, the respondent issued communication to the petitioners on different dates and conveyed the deficiencies found inthe applications to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitions are required to comply all the deficiencies and thereafter, the respondents are required to process the applications strictly in terms of newRegulations 2014.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties jointly state that for recognition to the petitioner's institution was upto 3'''' March, 2015, however, the said date has been extended by the Supreme Court upto 31®^ h May, 2015. Thus, the respondents have sufficiently time to process the applications ofthe petitioners.

6. Accordingly, I direct the respondents to process the applications of the petitioners strictly in terms of new Regulations of 2014 and decide and communicate the same to the petitioners at every stage.

7. This Court expects from the petitioners to remove the deficiencies, if any, within shortest period. Accordingly, the respondents shall pursue the applications of the petitioners to the next step. Needless to state that if the petitioners comply the instructions of the respondents within shortest time, the time of the respondents shall be reckoned for the next step from completion ofthedeficiencies/short-coming, if any.

8. I hereby also make it clear that the order passed bythis Court shall be subject to the order passed by the Writ Court on the applications moved by the respondents.

9. In viewof above, thepetitions are disposed of SURESHKAIT, J MARCH 10,2015 rs