Kuldeep v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 24 Mar 2015 · 2015:DHC:10579
Manmohan Singh
BAIL APPLN.1430/2014
2015:DHC:10579
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of anticipatory bail applications as infructuous after the parties amicably settled the dispute and the FIR under Section 420 IPC was quashed.

Full Text
Translation output
..J r $-20& 21 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.1430/2014
MADHUBALA Petitioner
Through Mr.Deepak K.Tyagi,Adv.
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI
Through
BAIL APPLN.1431/2014
KULDEEP
Respondent Mr.Satish Verma,APP forthe State.
Petitioner
Through Mr.DeepakK.Tyagi,Adv.
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent
Through Mr.Satish Verma,APP forthe State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
24.03.2015 The present bail applications have been filed by the petitioners, namely,Kuldeep and Madhu Bala,under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.203/2014, under Section 420 IPG, registered atP.S. Sector-23,Dwarka,Delhi. By order dated 4''^ July,2014, both the petitioners were granted interim protection, subject to the conditionsthatthey wouldjoin and cooperateintheinvestigation and would
2015:DHC:10579 also depositasum ofRs.3 lac by way ofFixed Deposits from a Nationalized
Bank in the name ofthe learned Trial Court,initially valid for a period of one year, with the 10 ofthe case. The petitioners have complied the said order. Onthe requestofthe parties,i.e.the petitioners and the complainant, this Court by order dated 27"^ November,2014 referred the matters to the
Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre for the purpose of settlement. The parties have settled their disputes amicably. The original
Settlement Agreement dated 8"" December, 2014 is placed on the record which is duly signed by the parties. On the basis ofthe said settlement,the
FIR in question has already been quashed qua both the petitioners by order dated 25^*'February,2015 passed by this Court in Crl. M.C.No.738/2015.
No further orders are required to be passed in these petitions. The same are accordingly disposed of.
MARCH 24,2015/ka 2015:DHC:10579
JUDGMENT