Janhavi Duggal v. State & Anr

Delhi High Court · 25 Mar 2015 · 2015:DHC:11796
Hima Kohli
TEST.CAS. 37/2011 & TEST.CAS. 38/2011
2015:DHC:11796
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitions for non-prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to comply with procedural requirements and expressed intention to withdraw after settlement.

Full Text
Translation output
ii 20 & 21 $' HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TEST.CAS. 37/2011 &TEST.CAS. 38/2011
JANHAVI DUGGAL petitioner
Through None
VERSUS
STATE &ANR Respondents
Through Ms.M.S.Vinaik, Advocate for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
°/o 25.03.2015
ORDER

1. The matters were passed over as none was present on behalf of the petitioner on the first call. At that time, Mr. Vinall<, counsel for the respondent No.2 was present. None is present on pass over.

2. Aperusal of the order sheet shows that the petitioner has not been taking steps to prosecute the present petitions by depositing the charges for publication of citations in the newspaper.

3. Vide order dated 1.10.2014, last and final opportunity was granted to the petitioner to take steps and the matters were adjourned to 22.12.2014. On 22.12.2014, subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- imposed on the petitioner, final opportunity was granted to her to issue notice to the general public in the TEST.CAS. 37/2011 &TEST.CAS. 38/2011 Page No.1of[2] 2015:DHC:11796 y newspaper and the matters wer^adjourned to 13.2,2015. On 13.2.2015, the petitioner had appeared in person and stated that she had arrived at a settlement and wished to withdraw the present petitions.

4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petitions which are accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. march 25, 2015 ^ mk TEST.CAS. 37/2011 &TEST.CAS. 38/2011 Page No.2 of[2]