Full Text
Translation output
Crl.M.C.No.412/2015 Page 1 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: March 25, 2015
Date of Decision: March 25, 2015
CRL.M.C. 412/2015 & Crl.M.A.1615/2015
PRASHANT PAUL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Advocate
PRASHANT PAUL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Advocate
VERSUS
M/S C.G.FOODS ( NEPAL) PVT LTD ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate
Through: Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
In proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments
Act, 1881, vide impugned order of 29th November, 2014 while relying upon Apex Court’s decision in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of
Maharashtra (2014) 9 SCC 129 trial court has put up the complaint for cross-examination of complainant by observing that the complaint case in question has reached the stage of Section 145 (2) of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881.
At the hearing, learned counsel for petitioner had submitted that the cross-examination of the complainant has not yet started. It is submitted that in view of the dictum of the Apex Court in Dashrath Rupsingh
(supra), the complaint in question has to be transferred to the court of competent territorial jurisdiction. Whereas, it is maintained by learned
2015:DHC:2883 Crl.M.C.No.412/2015 Page 2 counsel for respondent that the cross-examination of respondent- complainant had started on 28th February, 2013 and so, the complaint case in question ought to be tried by the Delhi courts.
Upon hearing and on perusal of the impugned order and Apex
Court’s decision in Dashrath Rupsingh (supra) as reiterated in Shivgiri
Associates v. Metso Mineral (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2014) 12 SCC 366 and the decision rendered by this Court in CRL.M.C. 700/2012 in Neerav J. Shah
& Anr. v. State & Anr. rendered on 23rd March, 2015, I find that the complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in which the cross-examination of complainant after allowing of application under Section 145 (2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 has not started, are to be returned back for re-filing them before the court of competent territorial jurisdiction within 30 days of the said return of the complaints.
It is apparent from the impugned order of 29th November, 2014 that the cross-examination of respondent-complainant is yet not started. Thus, in view of decision rendered in CRL.M.C. 700/2012, Neerav J. Shah
(supra), the impugned order is hereby quashed and trial court is directed to return respondent’s complaint for re-filing it within 30 days before the court of competent territorial jurisdiction.
This petition and the application are accordingly disposed of.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
MARCH 25, 2015 s 2015:DHC:2883
In proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments
Act, 1881, vide impugned order of 29th November, 2014 while relying upon Apex Court’s decision in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of
Maharashtra (2014) 9 SCC 129 trial court has put up the complaint for cross-examination of complainant by observing that the complaint case in question has reached the stage of Section 145 (2) of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881.
At the hearing, learned counsel for petitioner had submitted that the cross-examination of the complainant has not yet started. It is submitted that in view of the dictum of the Apex Court in Dashrath Rupsingh
(supra), the complaint in question has to be transferred to the court of competent territorial jurisdiction. Whereas, it is maintained by learned
2015:DHC:2883 Crl.M.C.No.412/2015 Page 2 counsel for respondent that the cross-examination of respondent- complainant had started on 28th February, 2013 and so, the complaint case in question ought to be tried by the Delhi courts.
Upon hearing and on perusal of the impugned order and Apex
Court’s decision in Dashrath Rupsingh (supra) as reiterated in Shivgiri
Associates v. Metso Mineral (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2014) 12 SCC 366 and the decision rendered by this Court in CRL.M.C. 700/2012 in Neerav J. Shah
& Anr. v. State & Anr. rendered on 23rd March, 2015, I find that the complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in which the cross-examination of complainant after allowing of application under Section 145 (2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 has not started, are to be returned back for re-filing them before the court of competent territorial jurisdiction within 30 days of the said return of the complaints.
It is apparent from the impugned order of 29th November, 2014 that the cross-examination of respondent-complainant is yet not started. Thus, in view of decision rendered in CRL.M.C. 700/2012, Neerav J. Shah
(supra), the impugned order is hereby quashed and trial court is directed to return respondent’s complaint for re-filing it within 30 days before the court of competent territorial jurisdiction.
This petition and the application are accordingly disposed of.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
MARCH 25, 2015 s 2015:DHC:2883