Sonu Sharma v. State; Damodar Sharma @ Deepak Sharma v. State

Delhi High Court · 06 Apr 2015 · 2015:DHC:10551
S. P. Garg
Bail Appln. 1205/2013; Bail Appln. 1656/2013
2015:DHC:10551
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of bail applications after the petitioners complied with court-ordered payments to the complainant, demonstrating bona fide efforts to satisfy financial conditions for bail.

Full Text
Translation output
$-9 & 10 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 1205/2013
SONU SHARMA Petitioner
Through : Mr.K.K.Sharma, Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP.
Mr.Jugal Wadhwa, Advocate for the complainant along with complainant present in person.
BAIL APPLN. 1656/2013 & Crl.M.A. 11618/2014
DAMODAR SHARMA @ DEEPAK SHARMA Petitioner
Through : Mr.K.K.Sharma, Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through ; Ms.Kusum Dhalla,APP.
Mr.Jugal Wadhwa, Advocate for the complainant along with complainant present in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
06.04.2015 Learned counsel for the petitioners have paid ?1,00,000/- cash
BailAppl.Nos. 1205/13 &1656/13 Page 1of2 2015:DHC:10551 r v; to the complainant inthepresence ofhis counsel Mr.Jugal Wadhwa in the court.
It is stated that the petitioners have so far paid ^5,00,000/- to the complainant in compliance of the order dated26.05.2014.
^5,000/- remain to be paid as costs. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that this payment shall be made within a week to the learned counsel for the complainant.
In view of this, both bail applications stand disposed of. All pending application(s) also stand disposed of.
S.^A^,J.
APRIL 06, 2015 sa BailAppl.Nos. 1205/13 &1656/13 Page 1of2
2015:DHC:10551
JUDGMENT