Full Text
Translation output
$46 & 52 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1525/2015 & Cr1.
M.A.No.5584/2015
MANISH GARG & ORS. Petitioners
Through: Mr. R.K. Paliwal & Mr. Sudhir Mathur, Advocates
CRL.M.C. 1525/2015 & Cr1.
M.A.No.5584/2015
MANISH GARG & ORS. Petitioners
Through: Mr. R.K. Paliwal & Mr. Sudhir Mathur, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE & ORS.
Respondent
Through: Ms. Nishi Jam, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Harpal
Respondent
Through: Ms. Nishi Jam, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Harpal
CRL.M.C. 1531/2015 & Cr1.
M.A.No.5606/201
BRIJ BHUSHAN PAPPU & ORS. Petitioners
Through: Mr. V.K. Sabharwal, Advocate
M.A.No.5606/201
BRIJ BHUSHAN PAPPU & ORS. Petitioners
Through: Mr. V.K. Sabharwal, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE & ORS. Respondents
Through: Ms. Nishi Jam, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Harpal
Through: Ms. Nishi Jam, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Harpal
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
17.04.2015 In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of FIR NO. 201/2015 [in Cr!. M.C. No. 1525/2015] & FIR No. 202/2012 [in
Crl.MC.No.1531I2015], both under Sections 308/323/324/34 and registered at police station Ranjit Nagar, Delhi is sought by petitioners on the basis of Compromise Deed of
7th April, 2015.
Crl.M.C.No.1525/2015 Page 1 CrI.M.C.No. 1531/2015
2015:DHC:10789 With the consent of counsel for, the parties, above captioned two petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
Notice.
Ms. Nishi Jam, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice in both these petitions and submits that petitioner-accused of these FIRs are not forthcoming for investigation.
Learned counsel for petitioners-accused submits that not only petitioners even the complainants of these cross FIRs are ready to join
• investigation and they would be appearing before the Investigating
Officers tomorrow i.e. on 18th April, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. and thereafter, as and when called.
Let the parties join investigation in these FIR cases and if the complainant party of both these FIRs come forward within a different version, then their supplementary statement be recorded by the
Investigating Officer and thereafter, final report be filed within a period of four weeks.
With aforesaid observations, the , above captioned two petitions and applications are disposed of with liberty to petitioners to avail of the remedy, as available in the law, if need be. In case, Investigating Officer
, chooses to proceed against the petitioners-accused then one week's notice in writing be given to them prior to their arrest.
Dasti.
SUNIL GAUR, J APRIL 17, 2015 r Crl.M.C.No.1525/2015
Page 2 Crl.M.C.No. 1531/2015 2015:DHC:10789
17.04.2015 In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of FIR NO. 201/2015 [in Cr!. M.C. No. 1525/2015] & FIR No. 202/2012 [in
Crl.MC.No.1531I2015], both under Sections 308/323/324/34 and registered at police station Ranjit Nagar, Delhi is sought by petitioners on the basis of Compromise Deed of
7th April, 2015.
Crl.M.C.No.1525/2015 Page 1 CrI.M.C.No. 1531/2015
2015:DHC:10789 With the consent of counsel for, the parties, above captioned two petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
Notice.
Ms. Nishi Jam, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice in both these petitions and submits that petitioner-accused of these FIRs are not forthcoming for investigation.
Learned counsel for petitioners-accused submits that not only petitioners even the complainants of these cross FIRs are ready to join
• investigation and they would be appearing before the Investigating
Officers tomorrow i.e. on 18th April, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. and thereafter, as and when called.
Let the parties join investigation in these FIR cases and if the complainant party of both these FIRs come forward within a different version, then their supplementary statement be recorded by the
Investigating Officer and thereafter, final report be filed within a period of four weeks.
With aforesaid observations, the , above captioned two petitions and applications are disposed of with liberty to petitioners to avail of the remedy, as available in the law, if need be. In case, Investigating Officer
, chooses to proceed against the petitioners-accused then one week's notice in writing be given to them prior to their arrest.
Dasti.
SUNIL GAUR, J APRIL 17, 2015 r Crl.M.C.No.1525/2015
Page 2 Crl.M.C.No. 1531/2015 2015:DHC:10789
JUDGMENT