Full Text
Translation output
/ r $-54 & 55 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.ICI 4227/2015
S D POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE Petitioner
W.P.ICI 4227/2015
S D POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE Petitioner
VERSUS
ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION Respondent
AND
W>P.(CI 4247/2015 CBS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY & TECHNOLOGY Petitioner
W>P.(CI 4247/2015 CBS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY & TECHNOLOGY Petitioner
VERSUS
ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION Respondent
Through: Dr. N. Pradeep Sharma and Mr S. K.
Rout, Advocates for petitioners in item nos.54 & 55.
Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Naginder Benipal, Advocate for
AICTE/R-1.
Through: Dr. N. Pradeep Sharma and Mr S. K.
Rout, Advocates for petitioners in item nos.54 & 55.
Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Naginder Benipal, Advocate for
AICTE/R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
28.04.2015 CM No.7663/2015 in W.P.(C) 4227/2015
CM No.7690/2015 in W.P.(C) 4247/2015 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The applications stand disposed of.
28.04.2015 CM No.7663/2015 in W.P.(C) 4227/2015
CM No.7690/2015 in W.P.(C) 4247/2015 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The applications stand disposed of.
W.P.(CI 4227/2015 & CM No.7664/2015
W.P.(C) 4247/2015 & CM No.7691/2015
The petitioner had withdrawn the petitions seeking similar relief unconditionaly and after some arguments. The learned counsel for the
2015:DHC:10955
•y- petitioner submits that after withdrawal ofthe said petitions, the Aurangabad
Bench ofBombay High Court had passed an interim order dated 08.04.2015.
He prays that the petitioners should also be granted similar orders. It is noted that ad-interim orders passed by the Aurangabad Bench of the
Bombay High Court had been placed before this Court in the petitions filed by the petitioner earlier (i.e. W.P.(C) 2651/2015 &2436/2015). Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner had argued the matter at length and thereafter, withdrawn thepetitions unconditionally.
In the circumstances, the petitioners cannot be permitted to re-agitate the issues. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed.
APRIL 28,2015 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J 2015:DHC:10955
The petitioner had withdrawn the petitions seeking similar relief unconditionaly and after some arguments. The learned counsel for the
2015:DHC:10955
•y- petitioner submits that after withdrawal ofthe said petitions, the Aurangabad
Bench ofBombay High Court had passed an interim order dated 08.04.2015.
He prays that the petitioners should also be granted similar orders. It is noted that ad-interim orders passed by the Aurangabad Bench of the
Bombay High Court had been placed before this Court in the petitions filed by the petitioner earlier (i.e. W.P.(C) 2651/2015 &2436/2015). Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner had argued the matter at length and thereafter, withdrawn thepetitions unconditionally.
In the circumstances, the petitioners cannot be permitted to re-agitate the issues. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed.
APRIL 28,2015 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J 2015:DHC:10955
JUDGMENT