Full Text
Translation output
p HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)3633/2015
VIKAS Petitioner
Through: MrJashandeep Singh,Advocates.
W.P.(C)3633/2015
VIKAS Petitioner
Through: MrJashandeep Singh,Advocates.
VERSUS
UNION OFINDIA & ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vivek Goyal,CGSC with Mr.Dhirendra Yadav,Advocate for
R-I/UOI.
Ms.Anjana Gosain and Mr.Amab Naskar,Advocatesfor GNCTD.
Through: Mr.Vivek Goyal,CGSC with Mr.Dhirendra Yadav,Advocate for
R-I/UOI.
Ms.Anjana Gosain and Mr.Amab Naskar,Advocatesfor GNCTD.
AND
W.P.(C)3040/2015 and C.M.No.5433/2015
VIKAS THAKRAN . Petitioner
Through: Mr.RajKr.Sherawat withMr.Sushil Kumar,Advocates.
VIKAS THAKRAN . Petitioner
Through: Mr.RajKr.Sherawat withMr.Sushil Kumar,Advocates.
VERSUS
GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI& ORS. Respondents
Through: Ms.Ferida Satarawala,Advocatefor GNCTD.
AND
Through: Ms.Ferida Satarawala,Advocatefor GNCTD.
AND
W.P.(C)3043/2015 and C.M.No.5436/2015
MOHAN LAL Petitioner
Through: Mr.Raj Kr.Sherawat withMr.Sushil
MOHAN LAL Petitioner
Through: Mr.Raj Kr.Sherawat withMr.Sushil
VERSUS
GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI& ORS.
Respondents
Through: Mr.V.K.Tandon,Advocate.
2015:DHC:10958-DB AND
Respondents
Through: Mr.V.K.Tandon,Advocate.
2015:DHC:10958-DB AND
W.P.(C)3044/2015 and C.M.No.5438/2015
BIJENDER SINGH
Petitioner
Through: Mr.RajKr.Sherawat with Mr.Sushil
BIJENDER SINGH
Petitioner
Through: Mr.RajKr.Sherawat with Mr.Sushil
VERSUS
GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI& ORS.
Respondents
Through: Ms.Bandana Shuklafor Ms.Ruchi Sindhawani,Advocate.
Respondents
Through: Ms.Bandana Shuklafor Ms.Ruchi Sindhawani,Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
30.04.2015 After some arguments, counsel for the petitioners seek leave to withdraw these Writ Petitions with liberty to challenge the letter dated
15.11.2010 issued by the Regional Transport Authority, Agra whereby the said Authority has taken a decision that all the 81 licenses were fake licenses.
Reserving the said liberty to challenge the legality ofthe said letter issued by the Assistant Divisional Transport Officer ofRegional Transport
Office,Agra Region,the present WritPetitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
7- Liberty is also given to the petitioners that ifthey succeed in their challenge to the letter dated 15.11.2010, then all other legal remedies shall remain available to them.
KAILASH GAMBHIR,J APRIL30,2015 'dc' TA,J
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
30.04.2015 After some arguments, counsel for the petitioners seek leave to withdraw these Writ Petitions with liberty to challenge the letter dated
15.11.2010 issued by the Regional Transport Authority, Agra whereby the said Authority has taken a decision that all the 81 licenses were fake licenses.
Reserving the said liberty to challenge the legality ofthe said letter issued by the Assistant Divisional Transport Officer ofRegional Transport
Office,Agra Region,the present WritPetitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
7- Liberty is also given to the petitioners that ifthey succeed in their challenge to the letter dated 15.11.2010, then all other legal remedies shall remain available to them.
KAILASH GAMBHIR,J APRIL30,2015 'dc' TA,J
JUDGMENT