Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 05th May, 2025
MS SHANTI SWAROOP NIKHIL KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Jhamba, Ms. Thonpinao Thangal & Ms. Ayushi Srivastava, Advocates.
Through: Mr. Ajay Jain, Senior Panel Counsel, UOI; Mr. Kunaal Sharma; Mr. Bijay Lakshmi; Mr. Akul Singh Chalia, Mr. M.N. Mishra; Mr. R.C. Bansal; Mr. Akshat Jain & Mr. Krishna Sharma, Advocates (M- 9311044192)
Mr. K.G. Gopalkrishnan, Mr. Nish Mohandas & Mr. Kunwar Raj Singh, Advocates.
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
JUDGMENT
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-M/s. Shanti Swaroop Nikhil Kumar under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India inter alia challenging the impugned order dated 14th December, 2023 passed by Respondent No.3-Sales Tax Officer, Class II/AVATO, Ward 207, Zone 11, Delhi. The petition also challenges the vires of Notification NO. 09/2023-Central Tax dated 31st March, 2023 (hereinafter ‘impugned notification’).
3. This Court had the opportunity to hear a batch of petitions wherein inter alia, the impugned notification had been challenged. The W.P.(C) NO. 16499/2023 titled ‘DJST Traders Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.’ is the lead matter in the said batch of petitions. In the said petition, on 22nd April, 2025, the parties were heard at length qua the validity of the impugned notifications and accordingly, the following order was passed:
Telangana High Court is now presently under consideration by the Supreme Court in S.L.P No 4240/2025 titled M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors. The Supreme Court vide order dated 21st February, 2025, passed the following order in the said case:
7. In the meantime, the challenges were also pending before the Bombay High Court and the Punjab and Haryana High Court. In the Punjab and Haryana High Court vide order dated 12th March, 2025, all the writ petitions have been disposed of in terms of the interim orders passed therein. The operative portion of the said order reads as under:
8. The Court has heard ld. Counsels for the parties for a substantial period today. A perusal of the above would show that various High Courts have taken a view and the matter is squarely now pending before the Supreme Court.
9. Apart from the challenge to the notifications itself, various counsels submit that even if the same are upheld, they would still pray for relief for the parties as the Petitioners have been unable to file replies due to several reasons and were unable to avail of personal hearings in most cases. In effect therefore in most cases the adjudication orders are passed ex-parte. Huge demands have been raised and even penalties have been imposed.
10. Broadly, there are six categories of cases which are pending before this Court. While the issue concerning the validity of the impugned notifications is presently under consideration before the Supreme Court, this Court is of the prima facie view that, depending upon the categories of petitions, orders can be passed affording an opportunity to the Petitioners to place their stand before the adjudicating authority. In some cases, proceedings including appellate remedies may be permitted to be pursued by the Petitioners, without delving into the question of the validity of the said notifications at this stage.
11. The said categories and proposed reliefs have been broadly put to the parties today. They may seek instructions and revert by tomorrow i.e., 23rd April, 2025.”
4. Thereafter, on 23rd April, 2025, this Court, having noted that the validity of the impugned notifications is under consideration before the Supreme Court, had disposed of several matters in the said batch of petitions after addressing other factual issues raised in the respective petitions. Additionally, while disposing of the said petitions, this Court clearly observed that the validity of the impugned notifications therein shall be subject to the outcome of the proceedings before the Supreme Court.
5. The Court is today informed that the Petitioner has preferred an appeal against the impugned order dated 14th December, 2023. In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed.
6. However it is made clear that the issue in respect of the validity of the impugned notification is left open and the order of the Appellate Authority shall be subject to the outcome of the decision of the Supreme Court in S.L.P No 4240/2025 titled M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors..
7. The present petition is disposed of in these terms. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA JUDGE MAY 05, 2025/da/Ar. (corrected & released on 13th May, 2025)