Mukesh Kumar Chauhan v. Geeta Rani

Delhi High Court · 01 May 2015 · 2015:DHC:11717-DB
Kailash Gambhir; I. S. Mehta
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 18/2015
2015:DHC:11717-DB
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the appellant's petition for non-prosecution due to failure to serve the respondent and non-appearance in court.

Full Text
Translation output
GEETA @ GEETA RANI
Through None aor Respondent $-6 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 18/2015 and CM No.3559/20 15
MUKESH KUMAR CHAU}IAN Appellant
Through None
VERSUS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
01.05.2015 Steps have not been taken by the appellant to serve the respondent as process fee has not been filed by the appellant.
We find that on the last date of hearing, a direction was given for the appellant and respondent to remain present in Court on the next date of hearing.
Today, neither appellant nor his counsel is present in Court.
Accordingly, the present petition as well as the application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
KAILGAMBHIR, J ^EHTA., J MAY 01 9 2015 sd 2015:DHC:11717-DB
JUDGMENT