Kishor Kumar Singh v. Directorate of Education

Delhi High Court · 14 May 2015 · 2015:DHC:11830
Valmiki J. Mehta
W.P.(C) 6543/2014
2015:DHC:11830
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court declined to press writ petitions challenging termination of service where appointment letters extended the petitioners' employment, granting liberty to file fresh proceedings if terminated thereafter.

Full Text
Translation output
/ $-8 and 9 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 6543/2014 and C.M. No.15604/2014 (stay)
KISHOR KUMAR SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Advocate.
VERSUS
DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
W.P.(C) 6730/2014
SUKHMI DAYAL MISHRA Petitioner
Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Advocate.
[0
VERSUS
THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA
14.05.2015
ORDER

1. Since petitioners' services are continued by means of the letters of the respondent nos.[2] and 3 dated 29.9.2014 for appointment till 30.9.2015, these writ petitions are not pressed with liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate independent proceedings incase petitioners' services are sought tobe terminated JV.P.(C) Nos.6543/2014 &6730/2014 page[1] of[2] 2015:DHC:11830 2015:DHC:11830