Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 2094/2015 Page 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: May 18, 2015
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: May 18, 2015
CRL.M.C. 2094/2015
MOHAMMAD YUNUS KHAN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate
MOHAMMAD YUNUS KHAN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State
Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
In this petition, filed from jail, the only prayer is made to direct the sentence passed in Criminal Complaints No.8483/01, 4064/01, 1601/02, 468/09 & 467/09 to run concurrently and to release petitioner on the sentence already undergone by him.
Learned counsel for petitioner draws the attention of this Court to
Nominal Roll of petitioner, which indicates that he is in custody since
November, 2010 and for the various offences, the unexpired portion of the sentence ranges from three months to eight months.
Be that as it may.
Petitioner has been convicted in five criminal complaints under
2015:DHC:4408
In this petition, filed from jail, the only prayer is made to direct the sentence passed in Criminal Complaints No.8483/01, 4064/01, 1601/02, 468/09 & 467/09 to run concurrently and to release petitioner on the sentence already undergone by him.
Learned counsel for petitioner draws the attention of this Court to
Nominal Roll of petitioner, which indicates that he is in custody since
November, 2010 and for the various offences, the unexpired portion of the sentence ranges from three months to eight months.
Be that as it may.
Petitioner has been convicted in five criminal complaints under
2015:DHC:4408
CRL.M.C. 2094/2015 Page 2
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding the loan taken by him ranging from rupees five lac to nine lac.
Upon hearing and on perusal of the impugned judgments, in respect of five complaints in question and the Nominal Roll of petitioner, I find no justification to direct that the sentence awarded to petitioner in these five criminal cases ought to run concurrently.
This petition is accordingly dismissed.
Petitioner be apprised of this order through concerned Jail
Superintendent.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
MAY 18, 2015 s 2015:DHC:4408
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding the loan taken by him ranging from rupees five lac to nine lac.
Upon hearing and on perusal of the impugned judgments, in respect of five complaints in question and the Nominal Roll of petitioner, I find no justification to direct that the sentence awarded to petitioner in these five criminal cases ought to run concurrently.
This petition is accordingly dismissed.
Petitioner be apprised of this order through concerned Jail
Superintendent.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
MAY 18, 2015 s 2015:DHC:4408