Mehar Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 07 May 2015 · 2015:DHC:11832-DB
Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani
W.P.(G) 3168/2015 & W.P.(C) 4194/2015
2015:DHC:11832-DB
constitutional appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed two writ petitions for lack of actionable cause of action but granted liberty to file fresh petitions.

Full Text
Translation output
$-6 & 7 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(G) 3168/2015
MEHAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms.Niti Jain &
Mr.Dheeraj, Advocates
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with
Mr.Brajesh Kumar, Advocates forUOI AND
W.P.(C) 4194/2015
PANKAJ KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioners I Represented by: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms.Niti Jain &
Mr.Dheeraj, Advocates
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
07.05.2015 #..'1
V W.P.(C) 3168/2015 & W.P.rC) 4194/2015
ORDER

1. After some arguments realizing that an actionable cause has not been pleaded in the two writ petitions, counsel seeks leave to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions with respect to the claim of the petitioners. W.P.(C) 3168/2015 &W.P.(C) 4194/2015 Page 1of[2] T 2015:DHC:11832-DB V

2. Granting liberty as prayed for the writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed.

3. No costs. CMNo.5641/2015 in W.P.fO 3168/2015 CM No.7592/2015 in W.P.m 4194/2015 Dismissed.

PRADEEP NAN G, J. ♦RATIBHARAM? MAY 07,2015/pg </