Full Text
Translation output
$44 & 45 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 4340/2015
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner
Through Mr Saul Kapoor with Mr Sanat Kapoor, Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Shubharn Rastogi, Advocates.
W.P.(C) 4340/2015
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner
Through Mr Saul Kapoor with Mr Sanat Kapoor, Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Shubharn Rastogi, Advocates.
VERSUS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
Respondent
Through Mr Rohit Madan with Mr Ruchir Bhatia, / + W.P.(C) 4341/2015
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
4 .....Petitioner
Through Mr Saul Kapoor with Mr Sanat Kapoor, Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Shubham Rastogi,
Respondent
Through Mr Rohit Madan with Mr Ruchir Bhatia, / + W.P.(C) 4341/2015
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
4 .....Petitioner
Through Mr Saul Kapoor with Mr Sanat Kapoor, Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Shubham Rastogi,
VERSUS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, & ORS. .....Respondent
Through Mr Rohit Madan with Mr Ruchir Bhatia, CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
• % 06.05.2015
CM Nos.7859/2015 (exemption) in WP(C) 4340/2015
CM Nos.786112015 (exemption) in WP(C) 4341/2015
Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Through Mr Rohit Madan with Mr Ruchir Bhatia, CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
• % 06.05.2015
CM Nos.7859/2015 (exemption) in WP(C) 4340/2015
CM Nos.786112015 (exemption) in WP(C) 4341/2015
Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions.
WP(C) 4340/2015 & CM No.7860/2015 (stay)
WP(C) 4341/2015 & CM No.7862/2015 (stay)
In both the writ petitions, the petitioner has received Section 148
2015:DHC:10988-DB notices from two different Income Tax Officers. The learned counsel for respondent/Revenue has taken instructions. A letter addressed to Mr
Madan by ACIT, Circle 30(1), New Delhi has been placed before us. The letter is dated 30.04.20 15 and the same is taken on record. As per the said letter, the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 had been inadvertently issued to the petitioner by ACIT, Circle 30(1), New Delhi. It is further stated that the said notices issued by the said Income
Tax Officers are being withdrawn. Those notices pertain to Assessment
Year 2008-09 and 2009-10, which are the subject matter of the present writ petitions.
In view of the said letter, the position stands clarified. The petitioner has to respond to the notice under Section 148 issued by the
Assessing Officer at Circle 4(1), New Delhi.
The writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly.
^7^- BXDAR AHMED, J SANJ EV SACHDEVA, J MAY 06, 2015
St 2015:DHC:10988-DB
In both the writ petitions, the petitioner has received Section 148
2015:DHC:10988-DB notices from two different Income Tax Officers. The learned counsel for respondent/Revenue has taken instructions. A letter addressed to Mr
Madan by ACIT, Circle 30(1), New Delhi has been placed before us. The letter is dated 30.04.20 15 and the same is taken on record. As per the said letter, the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 had been inadvertently issued to the petitioner by ACIT, Circle 30(1), New Delhi. It is further stated that the said notices issued by the said Income
Tax Officers are being withdrawn. Those notices pertain to Assessment
Year 2008-09 and 2009-10, which are the subject matter of the present writ petitions.
In view of the said letter, the position stands clarified. The petitioner has to respond to the notice under Section 148 issued by the
Assessing Officer at Circle 4(1), New Delhi.
The writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly.
^7^- BXDAR AHMED, J SANJ EV SACHDEVA, J MAY 06, 2015
St 2015:DHC:10988-DB
JUDGMENT