Full Text
Translation output
Of $-30-32 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 339/2015
VIJAY GUPTA
Through
BAIL APPLN. 339/2015
VIJAY GUPTA
Through
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Through
Through
CRL.M.C. 5704/2014
ARUNELANGO
Through
ARUNELANGO
Through
VERSUS
Petitioner Mr.K.K. Manan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Dharmendra Singh and
Mr.Ankush Narang, Advs. Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State along with ASI Balujeet Singh.
Mr.Tarun Dewan, Adv. for complainant along with complainant in person.
Petitioner ]VIr.K.K. Manan, Sr. Adv. with STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents
Through Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along with ASI Balujeet Singh.
Mr.Tarun Dewan, Adv. for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person.
Mr.Ankush Narang, Advs. Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State along with ASI Balujeet Singh.
Mr.Tarun Dewan, Adv. for complainant along with complainant in person.
Petitioner ]VIr.K.K. Manan, Sr. Adv. with STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents
Through Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along with ASI Balujeet Singh.
Mr.Tarun Dewan, Adv. for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person.
CRL.M.C. 5768/2014
M/S GREENBAY INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD & ORS Petitioners
Through Mr.K.K. Manan, Sr. Adv. with
M/S GREENBAY INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD & ORS Petitioners
Through Mr.K.K. Manan, Sr. Adv. with
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents 2015:DHC:11175
J..
Through Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along withASIBalujeet Singh.
Mr.Tarun Dewan, Adv. for R-2 along with respondentNo.2 in person.
J..
Through Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along withASIBalujeet Singh.
Mr.Tarun Dewan, Adv. for R-2 along with respondentNo.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
29.05.2015 All the three above mentioned matters have arisen on the basis of complaint case No.103/1/2014 under Sections 420/ 406/ 467/ 468/
120-BIPC PS Palam Village, New Delhi.
During the pendency ofthe above mentioned petitions, parties have resolved their disputes. Learned counsel appearing for complainant has made the statement that the complainant has received the entire disputed amount of the subject matter and he has no objection if the proceedings in the summoning order dated IS^*"
November, 2014 in complaint case No.103/1/2014 be quashed. He further undertakes" to withdraw the complaint filed by the complainant. Ordered accordingly. Parties shall take the necessary steps in accordance with law.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent No.2/ complainant, the petitioners do not press their petitions for quashing. The same are accordingly disposed of
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Bail
Application No.339/2015 has become infractuous. Same is also disposed off.
MAY29,2015/vp ^ 2015:DHC:11175
29.05.2015 All the three above mentioned matters have arisen on the basis of complaint case No.103/1/2014 under Sections 420/ 406/ 467/ 468/
120-BIPC PS Palam Village, New Delhi.
During the pendency ofthe above mentioned petitions, parties have resolved their disputes. Learned counsel appearing for complainant has made the statement that the complainant has received the entire disputed amount of the subject matter and he has no objection if the proceedings in the summoning order dated IS^*"
November, 2014 in complaint case No.103/1/2014 be quashed. He further undertakes" to withdraw the complaint filed by the complainant. Ordered accordingly. Parties shall take the necessary steps in accordance with law.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent No.2/ complainant, the petitioners do not press their petitions for quashing. The same are accordingly disposed of
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Bail
Application No.339/2015 has become infractuous. Same is also disposed off.
MAY29,2015/vp ^ 2015:DHC:11175
JUDGMENT