Saurabh Walia v. State

Delhi High Court · 11 Jun 2015 · 2015:DHC:10663
S. Muralidhar
BAIL APPLN. 1167/2015
2015:DHC:10663
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner in a serious criminal case as the complainant opposed bail and the allegations prima facie warranted trial.

Full Text
Translation output
\ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 1167/2015
SAURABH WALIA Petitioner
Through: Dr. Alok Lakhanpal with Mr. Puneet Bajaj, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Mangal Rana and
Complainant in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR
11.06.2015
CRL. MA. 8842/2015 (EXEMPTION)
ORDER

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of BAIL APPLN. 1167/2015

3. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIRNo.501/2015 under Sections 323/341/506/307 of IPG at PoUce Station Rajouri Garden, New Delhi.

4. Heard the submissions of learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. Bail ApplicationNo. 1167/2015 Page 1 of[2] 2015:DHC:10663

5. The submission ofthe learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner wants to resolve this dispute with the complaint through mediation has not been agreed tobytheComplainant who ispresent inCourt. She states thatshe has suffered at the hands ofthe Petitioner and seeks justice.

6. The Court has perused the FIR and other documents placed on record. Prima facie the allegations appear to be serious in nature anddo not warrant grant of anticipatory bailtothePetitioner, atthisstage.

7. The applicationis dismissed. JUNE 11,2015 rs BailApplication No. 1167/2015 S.MURALroHAR (Vacation Judge) Page 2 of[2]