Full Text
Translation output
#40-4 1 $- HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 6596/2015 & CM APPL. 12025/2015
MIS. CHAITANYA CONSTRUCTION CO. .....Petitioner
Through Mr. S.S. Kulshresta, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.K. Misra, Advocate
W.P.(C) 6596/2015 & CM APPL. 12025/2015
MIS. CHAITANYA CONSTRUCTION CO. .....Petitioner
Through Mr. S.S. Kulshresta, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.K. Misra, Advocate
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents
Through Ms.Niti Jam, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for
GNCTD.
Mr. Sumit Chander, Advocate for Delhi Jal Board.
Through Ms.Niti Jam, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for
GNCTD.
Mr. Sumit Chander, Advocate for Delhi Jal Board.
AND
W.P.(C) 6600/2015& CM APPL. 12035/20 15
MIS. CHAITANYA CONSTRUCTION CO. .....Petitioner
Through Mr. S.S. Kulshresta, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.K. Misra, Advocate
MIS. CHAITANYA CONSTRUCTION CO. .....Petitioner
Through Mr. S.S. Kulshresta, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.K. Misra, Advocate
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents
Through Ms.Niti Jam, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for
GNCTD.
Mr. Sumit Chander, Advocate for Delhi Jal Board.
Through Ms.Niti Jam, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for
GNCTD.
Mr. Sumit Chander, Advocate for Delhi Jal Board.
W.P.(C) 6596/2015 & 6600/2015
2015:DHC:11184
2015:DHC:11184
CORAM:
HON'I3LE MR. JUSTICE MANMOIJAN
13.07.2015 Since the primary relief in the present writ petitions is to quash the
Special Audit Report dated 5th September, 2014 on the ground that petitioner had been falsely included in the list of fake firms, this Court is of the view that there are disputed questions of fact which arise for consideration.
Consequently, present writ petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings either in accordance with the disputes resolution mechanism stipulated in the contract, if any, or by way of a civil suit or any other remedy that may be available to the petitioner in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid liberty, present petitions, and applications are disposed of.
U
MANMiTTAN, j JULY 139 2015 rn
13.07.2015 Since the primary relief in the present writ petitions is to quash the
Special Audit Report dated 5th September, 2014 on the ground that petitioner had been falsely included in the list of fake firms, this Court is of the view that there are disputed questions of fact which arise for consideration.
Consequently, present writ petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings either in accordance with the disputes resolution mechanism stipulated in the contract, if any, or by way of a civil suit or any other remedy that may be available to the petitioner in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid liberty, present petitions, and applications are disposed of.
U
MANMiTTAN, j JULY 139 2015 rn
W.P.(C) 6596/2015 & 6600/2015
2015:DHC:11184
2015:DHC:11184
JUDGMENT