Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 7th May, 2025
M/S. MOHAN INTERNATIONAL THROUGH ITS KARTA MOHIT
KAUSHIK .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Ms. Aamnaya Sagannath Mishra, Mr. Keshav Garg and Mr. Abhinav Sharde, Advocates.
Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC
Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Advocate.
Mr. Ravi Kant Srivastava, SPC
Prathiba M Singh, J. (Oral)
JUDGMENT
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging Notifications Nos. 09/2023-Central Tax dated 31st March, 2023, 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28th December, 2023 (hereinafter, ‘impugned notification’) on the ground that the same is ultra vires to the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Delhi Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
3. Further, the present petition assails the Show Cause Notice dated 19th December, 2023 and demand order dated 13th April, 2024 (hereinafter, ‘impugned order’) passed by Respondent No.2 - Sales Tax Officer Class II/AVATO, Ward 63, Zone 6, Delhi.
4. Additionally, the petition also challenges the Order-in-Appeal dated 2nd December, 2024 whereby the appeal filed by the Petitioner u/s 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, has been dismissed by the appellate authority on the ground of being barred by limitation.
5. The impugned notifications were under consideration before this Court in a batch of matters with the lead matter being W.P.(C) 16499/2023 titled ‘DJST Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and Ors.’. In the said batch of petitions, on 22nd April, 2025, the parties were heard at length qua the validity of the impugned notifications and accordingly, the following order was passed:
5. In fact, Notification Nos. 09 and 56 of 2023 (Central Tax) were challenged before various other High Courts. The Allahabad Court has upheld the validity of Notification no.9. The Patna High Court has upheld the validity of Notification no.56. Whereas, the Guwahati High Court has quashed Notification No. 56 of 2023 (Central Tax).
6. The Telangana High Court while not delving into the vires of the assailed notifications, made certain observations in respect of invalidity of Notification No. 56 of 2023 (Central Tax). This judgment of the Telangana High Court is now presently under consideration by the Supreme Court in S.L.P No 4240/2025 titled M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors. The Supreme Court vide order dated 21st February, 2025, passed the following order in the said case:
7. Dr. Muralidhar pointed out that there is a cleavage of opinion amongst different High Courts of the country. 8. Issue notice on the SLP as also on the prayer for interim relief, returnable on 7-3-2025.”
7. In the meantime, the challenges were also pending before the Bombay High Court and the Punjab and Haryana High Court. In the Punjab and Haryana High Court vide order dated 12th March, 2025, all the writ petitions have been disposed of in terms of the interim orders passed therein. The operative portion of the said order reads as under:
8. The Court has heard ld. Counsels for the parties for a substantial period today. A perusal of the above would show that various High Courts have taken a view and the matter is squarely now pending before the Supreme Court.
9. Apart from the challenge to the notifications itself, various counsels submit that even if the same are upheld, they would still pray for relief for the parties as the Petitioners have been unable to file replies due to several reasons and were unable to avail of personal hearings in most cases. In effect therefore in most cases the adjudication orders are passed exparte. Huge demands have been raised and even penalties have been imposed.
10. Broadly, there are six categories of cases which are pending before this Court. While the issue concerning the validity of the impugned notifications is presently under consideration before the Supreme Court, this Court is of the prima facie view that, depending upon the categories of petitions, orders can be passed affording an opportunity to the Petitioners to place their stand before the adjudicating authority. In some cases, proceedings including appellate remedies may be permitted to be pursued by the Petitioners, without delving into the question of the validity of the said notifications at this stage.
11. The said categories and proposed reliefs have been broadly put to the parties today. They may seek instructions and revert by tomorrow i.e., 23rd April, 2025.”
6. Thereafter, on 23rd April, 2025, this Court, having noted that the validity of the impugned notifications is under consideration before the Supreme Court, had disposed of several matters in the said batch of petitions after addressing other factual issues raised in the respective petitions. Additionally, while disposing of the said petitions, this Court clearly observed that the validity of the impugned notifications therein shall be subject to the outcome of the proceedings before the Supreme Court in S.L.P. NO. 4240/2025 titled M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors.
7. On facts, however, it is the case of the Petitioner that an appeal has already been filed by u/s 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, challenging the impugned order dated 13th April, 2024. However, the same stands dismissed by the appellate authority on the ground of limitation. Relevant portion of the order dated 2nd December, 2024, passed by the appellate authority is extracted herein below:
Appeal preferred by the appellant is hereby dismissed in limine.
5. Ordered accordingly.”
8. In the opinion of this Court, the appeal filed by the Petitioner u/s 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 shall be heard on merits by the Appellate Authority and shall not be dismissed on limitation, so long as the appeal complies with the other conditions under Section 107 of the said Act including pre-deposit.
9. In view of the abovementioned circumstances, and the fact that the challenge to the impugned notification is pending before the Supreme Court, this Court is inclined to provide the Petitioner another opportunity to present its case on merits. Accordingly, the order dated 2nd December, 2024 is set aside and the appeal is restored to its original number. The appeal shall now be adjudicated on merits after affording a personal hearing to the Petitioner. A hearing notice of the Appeal shall be provided by the Appellate Authority on the following email address: Mobile: 9811081159 E-mail: bhatiav68@gmail.com
10. All the rights and remedies of the parties are left open. Access to the GST Portal, if not already available, shall be ensured to be provided to the Petitioner to enable access to the notices and related documents.
11. However, it is made clear that the issue in respect of the validity of the impugned notifications is left open and the order of the Appellate Authority shall be subject to the outcome of the decision of the Supreme Court in S.L.P No 4240/2025 titled ‘M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors’.
12. The present petition is disposed of in said terms. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, JUDGE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA JUDGE MAY 7, 2025/da/rks (corrected and released on 15th May, 2025)