OKTATBYEBYE.COM v. TATA SONS LIMITED

Delhi High Court · 29 Jul 2015 · 2015:DHC:6027
Hima Kohli
CS(OS) 1753/2009
2015:DHC:6027
civil settled

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court accepted a voluntary settlement between the parties regarding trademark and domain name rights and disposed of the suit accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
CS(OS) 1753/2009
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS(OS) 1753/2009
OKTATBYEBYE.COM ..... Plaintiff
Through: Ms. Nancy Roy, Advocate
VERSUS
TATA SONS LIMITED & ORS ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr. Achuthan Sreekumar and Mr. Karan Kamra, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI O R D E R 29.07.2015
I.A. 15050/2015 (joint application u/O XXIII R 3 CPC)
JUDGMENT

1. The present joint application has been filed by the parties stating inter alia that during the pendency of the suit, they have arrived at a settlement in terms whereof, the plaintiff has acknowledged the defendant No.1 to be the proprietor of the trademark, “TATA” and in turn, the defendant No.1 has acknowledged that the plaintiff is the current owner of the domain name, www.oktatabyebye.com, subject to the said domain name being used in the manner as stipulated in para 3 of the application. The plaintiff has confirmed that it has changed its old logo and the new logo that they are using has been depicted in page 8 of the present application. The remaining terms 2015:DHC:6027 CS(OS) 1753/2009 and conditions of the settlement have been set out in paras 4 to 10 of the application.

2. In view of the undertakings given by the parties to each other, learned counsels state that the suit may be disposed of.

3. The Court has perused the present application. The same has been signed by the authorised signatories of the plaintiff and the defendant No.1 and their respective counsels and the same is supported by the affidavits of the signatories to the application.

4. As counsels for the parties jointly state that their clients have arrived at the aforesaid settlement of their own free will and volition and without any undue influence or coercion from any quarters, there appears no legal impediment in accepting the said settlement. The parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement recorded in the application. The suit is decreed in terms of the settlement recorded in the application.

5. The application is allowed. The suit is disposed of alongwith the pending applications and the Chamber Appeal, while leaving the parties to bear their own expenses. HIMA KOHLI, J JULY 29, 2015 rkb/ap