Full Text
Translation output
2- $-14, 15 and 16 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 3627/2015 and CMNo. 6473/2015
.. Petitioner BLB LIMITED DUPUTYCOMMIsSeRofincometax&
ORS Respondents
W.P.(C) 3627/2015 and CMNo. 6473/2015
.. Petitioner BLB LIMITED DUPUTYCOMMIsSeRofincometax&
ORS Respondents
W.P.(C) 3666/2015 and CMNo. 6526/2015
Petitioner DEPUTYCOMMISSIOOTROF INCOME-TAX& ORS Respondents
Petitioner DEPUTYCOMMISSIOOTROF INCOME-TAX& ORS Respondents
W.P.(C) 3782/2015
Petitioner deputy COMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX& Respondents
^ Through; Mr S. Krishnan for petitioner MrRohit Madan for CIT
HoSMR.JUSTICEBADARDURREZAHMED
HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
0/„ 30.07.2015
These writ petitions essentially seek directions with regard to the reftmd claims ofthe petitioners in respect of the assessment 2006-07 to assessment years
2011-12. Different amounts have been claimed in each ofthe writ petitions need notgo into specifics asweare directingrespondentNo. 1todispose ofthe said applications for refiind within four weeks from today. We are giving the specific direction because the learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out to us that applications have been pending since 2012. We are not passing any orders on the prayers for costs as we are giving respondent No. 1an opportunity to clear the backlogand to decidetheretad claimsand grantthe consequential relief, itany, in
2015:DHC:11507-DB accordancewithlaw withinaperiodoffour weeks. Itisorderedaccordingly.
The writ petitions stand disposed of.
JULY 30, 2015 su bSSaR DURREZ AHMED, J A SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
2015:DHC:11507-DB
Petitioner deputy COMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX& Respondents
^ Through; Mr S. Krishnan for petitioner MrRohit Madan for CIT
HoSMR.JUSTICEBADARDURREZAHMED
HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
0/„ 30.07.2015
These writ petitions essentially seek directions with regard to the reftmd claims ofthe petitioners in respect of the assessment 2006-07 to assessment years
2011-12. Different amounts have been claimed in each ofthe writ petitions need notgo into specifics asweare directingrespondentNo. 1todispose ofthe said applications for refiind within four weeks from today. We are giving the specific direction because the learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out to us that applications have been pending since 2012. We are not passing any orders on the prayers for costs as we are giving respondent No. 1an opportunity to clear the backlogand to decidetheretad claimsand grantthe consequential relief, itany, in
2015:DHC:11507-DB accordancewithlaw withinaperiodoffour weeks. Itisorderedaccordingly.
The writ petitions stand disposed of.
JULY 30, 2015 su bSSaR DURREZ AHMED, J A SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
2015:DHC:11507-DB
JUDGMENT