Full Text
Translation output
'
'
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
(i) + CRL.M.C. 582/2013 & Crl.M.A.1890/2013 GOPAL KRISHNA' BEHETI ..... Petitioner
Through: Nemo
'
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
(i) + CRL.M.C. 582/2013 & Crl.M.A.1890/2013 GOPAL KRISHNA' BEHETI ..... Petitioner
Through: Nemo
VERSUS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent
(ii) +
Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor, with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Utkarsha Kohli, Advocates for respondent-CBI with I.O./Dy. SP. Vipin Kumar
(ii) +
Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor, with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Utkarsha Kohli, Advocates for respondent-CBI with I.O./Dy. SP. Vipin Kumar
CRL.M.C. 745/2013 & Crl.M.A.2432/2013
GOPAL KRISHNA BEHETI ..... Petitioner
GOPAL KRISHNA BEHETI ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent
(iii) + Advocates for respondent-CHI
(iii) + Advocates for respondent-CHI
CRL.M.C. 1133/2013 & Crl.M.A.3472/2013
RAJENDRA KHATIR ..... Petitioner
RAJENDRA KHATIR ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
C.B.I. ..... Respondent CRL.MCs. 582, 745, 1133, 1143 & 1144 of2013 Page 1
2015:DHC:11262
•
(iv) + CRL.M.C. 1143/2013 & Crl.M.A.3514/2013
NITIN BOLlA ..... Petitioner
2015:DHC:11262
•
(iv) + CRL.M.C. 1143/2013 & Crl.M.A.3514/2013
NITIN BOLlA ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
C.B.I. ..... Respondent (v) + CRL.M.C. 1144/2013 & Crl.M.A.3516/2013
SIDIK HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner
SIDIK HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
C.B.I.
CORAM: ..... Respondent Advocates for respondent-CBI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
06.08.2015 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-CHI submits that these five petitions arise out of one RC and therefore, these petitions
CRL.MCs. 582, 745, 1133, 1143 & 1144 of2013 Page2
• were taken up for hearing together and by this common order, they are being disposed of.
The order impugned m these petitions 1s the order directing framing of charge against petitioners.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-CHI further submits on instructions that the trial in the RC in question is at the fag end as the Investigating Officer of this case is under cross-examination and the next date before the trial court is 14th August, 2015.
None appears on behalf of petitioners even on the second call.
When this matter was taken up for hearing on 20th February, 2015, none had appeared on behalf of petitioners. It appears that petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing these petitions.
Accordingly, these five petitions and the applications are dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
AUGUST 06, 2015 s CRL.MCs. 582, 745, 1133, 1143 & 1144 of2013
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
Page3
06.08.2015 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-CHI submits that these five petitions arise out of one RC and therefore, these petitions
CRL.MCs. 582, 745, 1133, 1143 & 1144 of2013 Page2
• were taken up for hearing together and by this common order, they are being disposed of.
The order impugned m these petitions 1s the order directing framing of charge against petitioners.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-CHI further submits on instructions that the trial in the RC in question is at the fag end as the Investigating Officer of this case is under cross-examination and the next date before the trial court is 14th August, 2015.
None appears on behalf of petitioners even on the second call.
When this matter was taken up for hearing on 20th February, 2015, none had appeared on behalf of petitioners. It appears that petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing these petitions.
Accordingly, these five petitions and the applications are dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
AUGUST 06, 2015 s CRL.MCs. 582, 745, 1133, 1143 & 1144 of2013
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
Page3
JUDGMENT