Kavita Rant v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 7376/2015

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had approached the Central Administrative Tribunal by filing O.A. No. 1229/2014 wherein the petitioner had made a grievance that the respondents had appointed the candidates who had secured less marks than the applicant. Another grievance which was raised was that although the applicant had made a representation, the same W.P.(C) 73 76/2015 2015:DHC:11553-DB W.P.(C) 73 76/2015 had not been decided by the department. While disposing of the O.A., the following order was passed:

4. Pursuant to the directions contained in this order dated 11.04.2014, the respondents rejected the representation of the petitioner by an order dated 2 1.08.2014. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while disposing of the representation of the petitioner, the respondents showed scant regard of the directions so passed. It is also contended that instead of relying on the order in O.A. No. • 2937/2013 (Shri Parvesh Meena Vs.

GNCTD & Ors.) and NDMC LPA No. 66/2000, the department relied upon an overruled decision to defeat the legitimate claim of the petitioner. He further submits that another O.A. No. 1229/2014 filed, has been rejected by the learned Tribunal.

5. After some hearing in the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would assail the speaking order which has been passed in accordance with law.

AUGUST 07, 2015 sc SAN( AL,J

6. All rights of the petitioner and all grounds raised by her in the present writ petition are kept open to be agitated in the appropriate court ofjurisdiction.

7. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. -i.S.SISTANI, J