Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RESERVED ON : 6th AUGUST, 2015
Date of Decision: 10th AUGUST, 2015
CRL.A. 28/2006
BIRJU ..... Appellant
Through : Mr.Vimal Puggal, Advocate.
BIRJU ..... Appellant
Through : Mr.Vimal Puggal, Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE ..... Respondent
Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP.
Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
S.P.GARG, J.
The present appeal is allowed in terms of a detailed common
S.P.GARG, J.
The present appeal is allowed in terms of a detailed common
JUDGMENT
delivered today which is placed in the file of
Crl.A.No.900/2005 titled ‘Sonu @ Hari Chand vs. State’.
(S.P.GARG)
JUDGE
AUGUST 10, 2015 / tr 2015:DHC:6413
Crl.A.No.900/2005 titled ‘Sonu @ Hari Chand vs. State’.
(S.P.GARG)
JUDGE
AUGUST 10, 2015 / tr 2015:DHC:6413