Government of NCT of Delhi v. Wansla Bainsla

Delhi High Court · 11 Aug 2015 · 2015:DHC:11491-DB
G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
W.P.(C) 8030/2014
2015:DHC:11491-DB
administrative other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition on the petitioner’s consent to comply with the CAT order granting reservation to the respondent, without treating the compliance as precedent and without adjudicating the substantive grounds.

Full Text
Translation output
SANG GAL, J AUGUST 11, 2015 pst HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 8030/20 14 & CM.APPL 18773/2014(stay)
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI Petitioner
Through Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Additional
Standing Counsel for the petitioner along with Dr. Baleshvijayrun, Dy. Education
Officer, Zone-22.
VERSUS
WANSLA BAINSLA Respondent
Through Ms. Vidushi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
11.08.2015 Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that in view of the peculiar facts of this case, the petitioner has agreed to comply with the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 07.05.2014 without the same being treated as a precedent and submits that the respondent will be considered in the reserved category. As prayed, all the grounds raised by the petitioner in this petition are kept open.
The writ petition and the application are disposed of on the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner.
-s.
G.S.SISTANI, J 2015:DHC:11491-DB
JUDGMENT