VIRAJIMPEX PVT LTD v. TARACHAND THR LRS

Delhi High Court · 31 Aug 2015 · 2015:DHC:10891
V. K. Shali
C.R.P. 73/2015
2015:DHC:10891
criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed three criminal revision petitions as not pressed upon the petitioner's counsel's statement, disposing of all pending applications.

Full Text
Translation output
$-14 to 16 (common order)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C.R.P. 73/2015 &CM APPL.8941/2015 (stay)
VIRAJIMPEXPVTLTD
Through. Mr. S.P. Jha, Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Bhardwaj, Advocate
VERSUS
TARACHAND(D)THRLRS Respondent
Through: Nemo.
C.R.P. 74/2015 &CM APPL.9011/2015 (stay)
VIRAJIMPEX(P)LTD
Through: Mr. S.P. Jha, Advocate with
VERSUS
AMI CHAND (DECEASED) THRLRS Respondent
C.R.P. 75/2015 &CM APPL.9013/2015 (stay)
VIRAJIMPEX(P)LTD
Through: Mr. S.P. Jha, Advocate with
VERSUS
ISHWAR SINGH (DECEASED) THR LRS Respondent
CORAM;
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
31.08.2015 Mr. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press his present petitions. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitions stand dismissed as not pressed.
Pending applications also stand disposed of AUGUST 31, 2015/vk J-
Lr o 2015:DHC:10891
JUDGMENT