G.S. Jain & Associates v. Indian Oie Corporation Etd

Delhi High Court · 10 Sep 2015 · 2015:DHC:11899
Valmiki J. Mehta
EX.P. 1/2010 & EX.P. 2/2010
2015:DHC:11899
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

Execution petitions filed by the decree holder were disposed of as not pressed in view of an earlier judgment, with no opinion expressed on decree satisfaction.

Full Text
Translation output
$-22 and 23 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
EX.P. 1/2010
G.S. JAIN:& ASSOCIATES Decree Holder
Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Risha Mittal, Advocate.
VERSUS
INDIAN OIE CORPORATION ETD
Through: None.
EX.P. 2/2010
C.S. JAIN & ASSOCIATES
Judgement Debtor Decree Holder
Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Risha Mittal, Advocate.
VERSUS
INDIAN OIE CORPORATION ETD
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
10.09.2015
Judgement Debtor
ORDER

1. Counsel appearing for the decree holder states that he does not press these execution petitions in view of the judgment dated 7.9.2012 in EFA(OS)Nos. 17/2010 and 18/2010.

2. Execution petitions are accordingly disposed of. I may make it Ex.P.Nos. 1/2010 & 2/2010 page I of[2] 2015:DHC:11899 clear that this Court has not opined in any manner with respect to whether decree has been satisfied in whole or in part or if there is any amount allegedly due to the judgment debtor, and these aspects will be examined, if so required, in case any proceedings are initiated by the Judgment debtor. I/'' ^ VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 Ne