Full Text
Translation output
$-14-16 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 5109/2014 & CM No. 10176-10177/2014
MEDICITI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (MIMS) Petitioner
Through: MrAmit Kumar &MrAnkit Rajgarhia, Advs.
W.P.(C) 5109/2014 & CM No. 10176-10177/2014
MEDICITI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (MIMS) Petitioner
Through: MrAmit Kumar &MrAnkit Rajgarhia, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Respondents
Through: Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr Ajay
Kalra, Adv. for R-1.
MrT. Singhdev, Ms Biakthan Sangi &Ms Puja Sarkar, Advs. for R-2.
Through: Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr Ajay
Kalra, Adv. for R-1.
MrT. Singhdev, Ms Biakthan Sangi &Ms Puja Sarkar, Advs. for R-2.
W.P.(C) 5123/2014 & CMNos. 10214/2014
BGS INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Petitioner
Through: Mr Amit Kumar &Mr Ankit Rajgarhia, Advs.
BGS INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Petitioner
Through: Mr Amit Kumar &Mr Ankit Rajgarhia, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA &ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma, Adv. for R-1.
Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthan Sangi &Ms Puja
Through: Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma, Adv. for R-1.
Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthan Sangi &Ms Puja
W.P.(C) 5129/2014 & CM No. 10224/2014
LORD BUDDHA SHIKSHA PRATISTHAN SAHARSA Petitioner
Through: Mr Ashish Kumar, Adv.
LORD BUDDHA SHIKSHA PRATISTHAN SAHARSA Petitioner
Through: Mr Ashish Kumar, Adv.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA &ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr Rajesh Gogna, Adv. for R-1.
Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthan Sangi &Ms Puja
Through: Mr Rajesh Gogna, Adv. for R-1.
Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthan Sangi &Ms Puja
W.P.(C) 5109/2014, 5123/2014 &
5129/2014 Page 1of2 2015:DHC:11388
5129/2014 Page 1of2 2015:DHC:11388
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
10.09.2015 Learned counsels for the parties say that the issue raised in the aforementioned writ petitions stands concluded by a judgement of the
Supreme Court dated 20.08.2015, passed in WP(C) No. 705/2014, titled:
RoyalMedical Trust (Regd.) &Am. vs Union ofIndia &Anr.
The writ petitions and the applications are, accordingly, disposed of, in view ofthe statement made hereinabove by the counsels for parties.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 Idc
10.09.2015 Learned counsels for the parties say that the issue raised in the aforementioned writ petitions stands concluded by a judgement of the
Supreme Court dated 20.08.2015, passed in WP(C) No. 705/2014, titled:
RoyalMedical Trust (Regd.) &Am. vs Union ofIndia &Anr.
The writ petitions and the applications are, accordingly, disposed of, in view ofthe statement made hereinabove by the counsels for parties.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 Idc
W.P.(C) 5109/2014, 5123/2014 &5129/2014 Page 2of2
2015:DHC:11388
2015:DHC:11388
JUDGMENT