Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
(Common Order)
(Common Order)
W.P.(C) 6875/2007
AIR INDIA CABIN CREW ASSOCIATION Petitioner
Through: None
AIR INDIA CABIN CREW ASSOCIATION Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
UOI & ORS. Respondents
Through: Ms.Maneesha Dhir and Ms.Geeta Sharma, Advocates for R-l/UOL
Mr.H.S. Chandhoke and Mr.Rajan Ray, Advocates for R-4.
Through: Ms.Maneesha Dhir and Ms.Geeta Sharma, Advocates for R-l/UOL
Mr.H.S. Chandhoke and Mr.Rajan Ray, Advocates for R-4.
W.P.(C) 10330/2009
TRADE UNION JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE & ORS. Petitioners
Through: Ms.Shivangi Singh, Proxy Counsel.
TRADE UNION JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE & ORS. Petitioners
Through: Ms.Shivangi Singh, Proxy Counsel.
VERSUS
UOI &ORS. Respondents
Through: Ms.Maneesha Dhir and Ms.Geeta Sharma, Advocates for R-l/UOI.
Mr.H.S. Chandhoke and Mr.RajanRay, Advocates forR-5.
Through: Ms.Maneesha Dhir and Ms.Geeta Sharma, Advocates for R-l/UOI.
Mr.H.S. Chandhoke and Mr.RajanRay, Advocates forR-5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
ORDER o/„ 10.09.2015
CM No. 18149/2015 in WP(C1 6875/2007 (for discharge)
In the facts and circumstances explained in the application, Sh.Promod B. Agarwala, Advocate appearing for the petitioner is discharged
2015:DHC:11372-DB
•J from the matter.
Application is accordingly disposed of.
W.P.(Q Nos. 6875/2007 & 10330/2009 There is no representation for the petitioner in W.P.(C)
No.6875/2007.
Having heard the leaned counsel for the respondents and having perused the material available on record, we are ofthe opinion that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication on merits at this point of time.
Accordingly, both the writ petitionsare dismissed as infructuous.
UV" CHIEF JUSTICE SEPTEMBER 10,IQlSlrb JAYANT NATH, J
2015:DHC:11372-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
ORDER o/„ 10.09.2015
CM No. 18149/2015 in WP(C1 6875/2007 (for discharge)
In the facts and circumstances explained in the application, Sh.Promod B. Agarwala, Advocate appearing for the petitioner is discharged
2015:DHC:11372-DB
•J from the matter.
Application is accordingly disposed of.
W.P.(Q Nos. 6875/2007 & 10330/2009 There is no representation for the petitioner in W.P.(C)
No.6875/2007.
Having heard the leaned counsel for the respondents and having perused the material available on record, we are ofthe opinion that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication on merits at this point of time.
Accordingly, both the writ petitionsare dismissed as infructuous.
UV" CHIEF JUSTICE SEPTEMBER 10,IQlSlrb JAYANT NATH, J
2015:DHC:11372-DB
JUDGMENT