Full Text
Translation output
8.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
6.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
6.
ITA 413/2015
PR.GIT Appellant
Through:Mr N.P.Sahni,Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Nitin Gulati,Junior Standing Counsel and
Mr Judy James,Advocate.
PR.GIT Appellant
Through:Mr N.P.Sahni,Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Nitin Gulati,Junior Standing Counsel and
Mr Judy James,Advocate.
VERSUS
RAJIV GUPTA Respondent
Through:Mi"Satyen Sethi,Advocate.
Through:Mi"Satyen Sethi,Advocate.
AND
ITA 445/2015
P.RCIT Appellant
Through:Mr N.P.Sahni,Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Nitin Gulati,Junior Standing Counsel and
Mr Judy James,Advocate.
P.RCIT Appellant
Through:Mr N.P.Sahni,Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Nitin Gulati,Junior Standing Counsel and
Mr Judy James,Advocate.
VERSUS
RAJIV GUPTA Respondent
Through: Mr Satyen Sethi,Advocate.
Through: Mr Satyen Sethi,Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ITA Nos.413/2015& 445/2015 Page 1 of2
2015:DHC:11426-DB
01.09.2015 til In view ofthe decision dated 13 August 2015 ofthis Court in ITA
13 and 14 of 2014[CIT v. MGF Automobiles Ltd.], no substantial question oflaw arises. The appeals are dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR,J VIBHU BAKHRU,J SEPTEMBER 01,2015
MK
ITA Nos.413/2015 & 445/2015 Page2of2 2015:DHC:11426-DB
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ITA Nos.413/2015& 445/2015 Page 1 of2
2015:DHC:11426-DB
01.09.2015 til In view ofthe decision dated 13 August 2015 ofthis Court in ITA
13 and 14 of 2014[CIT v. MGF Automobiles Ltd.], no substantial question oflaw arises. The appeals are dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR,J VIBHU BAKHRU,J SEPTEMBER 01,2015
MK
ITA Nos.413/2015 & 445/2015 Page2of2 2015:DHC:11426-DB
JUDGMENT