ST ANTHONYS BOYS SECONDARY SCHOOL v. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS

Delhi High Court · 14 May 2025 · 2025:DHC:3492
Prateek Jalan
W.P.(C) 12957/2024
2025:DHC:3492
administrative other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in its earlier judgment to clarify that the writ petition challenging a memorandum did not involve issues related to the 2014 Circular.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 12957/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 12957/2024
ST ANTHONYS BOYS SECONDARY SCHOOL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sachin Singh Dalal, Mr. Akshat Singh & Mr. Joe Sebastian, Advocates.
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel
WITH
Mr. Nitesh Kumar
Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Ahlam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat & Mr. Amitoj Chadha, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
14.05.2025
ORDER

1. This petition has been listed today on an office note, at my instance, in view of an inadvertent typographical error in the judgment dated 08.05.2025, by which the petition was disposed of. The error is in paragraph 13 of the judgment, where the word “not” has been omitted from the first sentence.

2. Learned counsel for the parties are present, and with their consent, the judgment dated 08.05.2025 is rectified to the extent that paragraph 13 will be read as follows:-

“13. However, I am of the view that the aforesaid issue does not arise for determination in this writ petition. The challenge of the petitioner herein is against the memorandum dated 03.08.2024, which is not predicated on compliance or non-compliance with the 2014 Circular.”

W.P.(C) 12957/2024

3. The office note is disposed of.

4. The order be uploaded as a corrigendum.

PRATEEK JALAN, J MAY 14, 2025 ‘pv’/AD/