RAHUL& ANR Petitioners v. AGRICULTURALPRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE& ANR

Delhi High Court · 21 Sep 2015 · 2015:DHC:11430
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW; 21.09.2015 CM No.20144/2015 in W.P.fCI No. 8959/2015. CM No.20327/2015 in; W.P.(CI No. 8961/2015. CM No.20366/2015 in W.P.IO No.8965/2015, CM No.20366/2015 in W.P.tCI No.8965/2015. CM No.20195/2015 in; W.P.(C) No.8967
WP(C)No.8959/2015
2015:DHC:11430
administrative appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed multiple connected writ petitions against the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee by referring to an earlier order disposing of identical petitions, emphasizing judicial economy and granting interim relief subject to exceptions.

Full Text
Translation output
$-47 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(C)No.8959/2015&CM No.20143/2015(for stay).
RAHUL& ANR Petitioners
VERSUS
AGRICULTURALPRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE& ANR Respondents
48 W.P.(C)No.8961/2015&CM No.20148/2015(for stay).
NAEEM AKHATAR& ANR Petitioners )
VERSUS
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE
MARKETING COMMITTEE& ANR Respondents 49 W.P.(C)No.8965/2015&CM No.20190/2015(for stay).
PITAMBER& ANR Petitioners
VERSUS
50. W.P.(C)No.8967/2015&CM No.20194/2015(for stay).
RAMDHANI GUPTA & ANR Petitioners
VERSUS
51. W.P.(C)No.8969/2015&CM No.20196/2015(for stay).
RAHIS AHMED & ANR Petitioners
VERSUS
WPfO No 8959/2015, W.P.(C)No.8961/2015,W.P.(C)No.8965/2015,W.P.(C)No.8967/2015, W.P.(C)No.8969/2015,^^-(Q
No.8970/2015, W.P.(C)No.8972/2015, W.P.(C)No. 8994/2015, W.P.(C)No. 9008/2015, W.P.(C)No.9010/2015, W.P.(C)NO. 9062/2015& W.P.(C)No.9067/2015 , ^ v Page1 of4
2015:DHC:11430 AGRICULTURALPRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE& ANR Respondents
52 W.P.(C)No.8970/2015&CM No.20198/2015(forstay).
MUVIN&ANR -Petitioners
VERSUS
AGRICULTURALPRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE& Respondents
53 W.P.(C)No.8972/2015&CM No.20200/2015(for stay).
RAMPYRE& ANR Petitioners
VERSUS
54 W.P.(C)No.8994/2015&CM No.20269/2015(for stay).
KAYTJM& ANR Petitioners
VERSUS
57 W.P.(C)No.9008/2015&CM No.20359/2015(for stay)
PREM CHAND& ANR Petitioners
VERSUS
58 W.P.(C)No.9010/2015&CMNo.20361/2015(for stay).
NISAR& ANR Petitioners
VERSUS
WP(C)No.8959/2015, W.P.(C)No.8961/2015, W.P.(C)No.8965/2015, W.P.(C)No.8967/2015, No.8970/2015, fV.P.(C)No.8972/2015, W.P.(C)No.8994/2015, fV.P.fQ No. 9008/2015, W.P.(C)No.9010/2015, W.P.(C)NO. 9062/2015& W.P.(C)No.9067/2015 t ^a Page2of4 71 W.P.(C)No.9062/2015&CM No.20512/2015(for stay).
IQBAL& ANR. ••• Petitioners
VERSUS
ANR Respondents 72 W.P.(C)No.9067/2015&CM No.20520/2015(for stay).
SABIR& ANR Petitioners
VERSUS
AGRICULTURALPRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE & ANR Respondents
Counselfor the petitioners;- Mr. Anil Panwar with Ms. Apoorva Srivastava and Mr. Chetan Parkash, Advs.
Mr. Hemant Kumar and Mr. Sri Om Swaroop,Advs.
Counselfor the respondents:- Mr. N.K. Singh for Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat,Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW
21.09.2015 CM No.20144/2015 in W.P.fCI No. 8959/2015. CM No.20327/2015 in
W.P.(CI No. 8961/2015. CM No.20366/2015 in W.P.IO No.8965/2015, CM No.20366/2015 in W.P.tCI No.8965/2015. CM No.20195/2015 in
W.P.(C) No.8967/2015, CM No.20197/2015 in W.P.(CI No.8969/2015, CM No.20199/2015 in W.P.ICI No.8970/2015. CM No.20201/2015 in
W.P.rCI No.8972/2015, CM No.20270/2015 in W.P.ICI No.8994/2015, CM No.20360/2015 in W.P.fCI no.9008/2015. CM No.20362/2015 in
W.P.fCI No.9010/2015. CM No.20521/2015 in W.P.fCI No.9067/2015 &
CM No.20513/2015(all for exemption)in W.P.(C)No.9062/2015.
ORDER

1. Allowed,subjecttojust exceptions. W.P.(C)No.8959/2015, W.P.(Q No.8961/2015, W.P.(Q No.8965/2015, W.P.(C)No.8967/2015, IV.P.(C)No.8969/2015, W.P.(C) No. 8970/2015, W.P.(C) No. 8972/2015, W.P.(C) No. 8994/2015, W.P.(C) No. 9008/2015, fV.P.(C) No. 9010/2015, W.P.(C) NO. 9062/2015& W.P.(C)No.9067/2015 Page3of[4]

2. The CMsstand disposed of. W.P.(0 No. 8959/2015 & CM No.20143/2015 (for stay). W.P.(Q NO. 8961/2015 & CM No.20148/2015 (for stav^. W.P.(Q No. 8965/2015 & CM No.20190/2015 (for stavl, W.P.IO No. 8967/2015 & CM No.20194/2015(for stavl. W.P.tC^ No.8969/2015 & CM No.20196/2015 (for stavl. W.P.rC^ No. 8970/2015 & CM No.20198/2015 (for stay), W.P.(C[1] No. 8972/2015 & CM No.20200/2015 (for stay). W.P.(C) NO. 8994/2015 & CM No.20269/2015 (for stavl. W.P.(C[1] No. 9008/2015 & CM No.20359/2015 (for stavh W.P.(C) No. 9010/2015 & CM No.20361/2015(for stavl. W.P.(C[1] No.9062/2015 & CM No.20512/2015 (for stav^& W.P.(C)No.9067/2015&CM No.20520/2015(forstay).

3. The counsel for the petitioners states thatthese petitions are identical to the connected petitions listed on 15^*^ September, 2015 and may be disposed ofintermsofthe order dated 15^*"September,2015 in W.P.(C)NO. 8123/2015, W.P.(C)No.8126/2015, W.P.(C)No.8128/2015, W.P.(C)NO. 8129/2015, W.P.(C)No.8130/2015, W.P.(C)No.8131/2015, W.P.(C)NO. 8133/2015,W.P.(C)No.8134/2015,W.P.(C)No.8135/2015& W.P.(C)NO. 8140/2015.

4. It is ordered accordingly.

RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW,J SEPTEMBER 21,2015 pp.. fV.PrC)No.8959/2015, W.P.(C)No.8961/2015,1KP.(Q No.8965/2015,fV.P.(C)No.8967/2015, W.P.(C)No. No.8970/2015, W.P.(Q No.8972/2015, W.P.(C)No.8994/2015, W.P.(C)No. 9008/2015, W.P.(C)No.9010/2015, W.P.(C)NO. 9062/2015&W.P.(C)No.9067/2015 Page4of[4]