Godrej Consumer Products Limited v. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Limited

Delhi High Court · 21 Sep 2015 · 2015:DHC:7902
Hima Kohli
Ex.P. 112/2015
2015:DHC:7902
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition enforcing a consent decree based on the Judgment Debtor's assurance of compliance and cessation of the disputed advertisement.

Full Text
Translation output
Ex.P. 112/2015 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
EX.P. 112/2015
GODREJ CONSUMAER PRODUCTS LIMITED ..... Decree Holder
Through: Mr. Rajiv Tyagi, Mr. Afsar Nabi and Mr. Divakar Kumar, Advocates.
VERSUS
RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Judgement Debtor
Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall and Ms. Nancy Roy, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI O R D E R 21.09.2015
JUDGMENT

1. Pursuant to the order dated 13.8.2015, a reply has been filed by Judgment Debtor. Though, it is contended by the learned counsel for Judgment Debtor that there is no violation of the consent Judgment and Decree dated 30.3.2012, passed in CS(OS) No. 660/2012, he clarifies that even the advertisement against which the Decree Holder has a grievance, is not being aired any longer and nor shall it be aired in the future. He assures the Court that his client shall continue to abide by the consent Judgment and Decree dated 30.3.2012.

2. Learned counsel for Decree Holder is satisfied by the assurances extended by the other side. 2015:DHC:7902 Ex.P. 112/2015

3. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of while binding the Judgment Debtor to the statement recorded herein above. HIMA KOHLI, J SEPTEMBER 21, 2015 ap