Full Text
Translation output
LI
$-31 & 32 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV.55/2015
ARUN KUMAR NAYYAR Petitioner Thrqugh: appearance not given.
$-31 & 32 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV.55/2015
ARUN KUMAR NAYYAR Petitioner Thrqugh: appearance not given.
VERSUS
RAJTNI BAHL . ......
Respondent
Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Sanad K Jha, Advs.
Respondent
Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Sanad K Jha, Advs.
RC.REV.56/2015
ARUN KUMAR NAYYAR ......Petitioner
Through: appearance not given.
ARUN KUMAR NAYYAR ......Petitioner
Through: appearance not given.
VERSUS
HAZARJ LAL GARG .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Amit S Chadha, Adv with Mr. Deep Dhamija, Adv.
Through: Mr. Amit S Chadha, Adv with Mr. Deep Dhamija, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALl
24.09.2015 After brief submissions the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petitions and states that he is not assailing the impugned order passed by the learned ARC granting leave to defend to the respondent. However, he prays that a direction may be given to the learned
ARC to expedite the matter as expeditiously as possible.
In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, both the petitions are dismissed as not pressed.
It is needless to say that the learned ARC shall make every endeavour to decide the petition as expeditiously as possible keeping in view of the total pendency of the cases.
V.K. SHALl, J.
SEPTEMI , R 24, 2015 ac 2015:DHC:12020
24.09.2015 After brief submissions the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petitions and states that he is not assailing the impugned order passed by the learned ARC granting leave to defend to the respondent. However, he prays that a direction may be given to the learned
ARC to expedite the matter as expeditiously as possible.
In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, both the petitions are dismissed as not pressed.
It is needless to say that the learned ARC shall make every endeavour to decide the petition as expeditiously as possible keeping in view of the total pendency of the cases.
V.K. SHALl, J.
SEPTEMI , R 24, 2015 ac 2015:DHC:12020
JUDGMENT