Full Text
W.P.(C) 9255/2015
LATE K L PANDEY SCHOOL OF NURSING ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mayank Manish and Mr. Ravi Kant, Advocates
Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Advocate
CM No.21176/2015 (Exemption)
JUDGMENT
1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 9255/2015
2. Issue notice to the respondent.
3. Mr. Krishna accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.
4. In view of the directions that I propose to pass, the learned counsel for the respondent says that he does not wish to file a reply.
5. The substantive prayers sought for, in the captioned petition are as follows:- “..A. Issue an appropriate writ (s) / direction(s) or order (s) quashing the letters contained in Annexure P-1 and / or;
6. The learned counsel for the respondent states that vide the impugned communication dated 07.09.2015, deficiencies found have been communicated to the petitioner. It is his submission that if, compliance report is submitted by the petitioner and if, re-inspection fee is deposited, inspection would be carried out. 6.[1] It is further submitted that if, on inspection, deficiencies are found to be liquidated, then the recommendation for GNM course would obviously follow.
7. Having regard to the above, on the petitioner depositing the reinspection fee within two days from today, and submitting a compliance report within the same time frame, the respondent will carry out a re-inspection. 7.[1] Needless to say, the re-inspection will be carried out with due expedition, though not later than 10 days from today, keeping in mind that the last date of admission is 30.10.2015.
8. With the aforesaid observations in place, the captioned petition is disposed of.
9. Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 yg