ICICI BANK LTD v. SUNIL SHARMA

Delhi High Court · 06 Oct 2015 · 2015:DHC:10832
Pratibha Rani
CM(M) 939/2015 & CM(M) 941/2015
2015:DHC:10832
civil appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed ICICI Bank's petitions challenging trial court orders as withdrawn, granting liberty to seek appointment of receiver before the trial court.

Full Text
Translation output
$-51 &53 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM(M) 939/2015
ICICI BANK LTD Petitioner
Through: Mr.Punit K.Bhalla & Ms.Chetna Bhalla, Advocates
VERSUS
SUNIL SHARMA Respondent
Through: None AND
CM(M) 941/2015
ICICI BANK LTD Petitioner
Through: Mr.Punit K.Bhalla & Ms.Chetna Bhalla, Advocates
VERSUS
SAURABH Respondent
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
06.10.2015 CMNo.22478/2015 in CMfM) 939/2015 . .
CM No.22488/2015 in CMfM) 941/2015 Exemption allowed, subject toall justexceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
. CMfM) Nos. 939/2015 & 941/2015
ORDER

1. By way ofthese petitions filed under Article 227 ofthe Constitution ofIndia read with Section 151 CPC, petitioner is praying for setting aside CM(M)Nos. 939/2015 &941/2015 Page ' 0^2 2015:DHC:10832 the orders dated ll"' September, 2015 passed by learned Civil Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Suit Nos. 112/2015 & 113/2015.

2. Today learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw these petitions with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court with aprayer for appointment ofreceiver citing earlier decisions by this Court on the subject.

3. These petitions are dismissed as withdrawn and the liberty as prayed for is granted. lTI OCTOBER 06, 2015 'Pg'