Kartikje Enterprises v. Delhi Jal Board

Delhi High Court · 13 Oct 2015 · 2015:DHC:10810
Najmiwaziri, J
ARB.P. 505/2015
2015:DHC:10810
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under the arbitration clause after parties failed to do so within the stipulated time, thereby facilitating the arbitration process.

Full Text
Translation output
49 to 54 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ARB.P. 505/2015
KARTIKJE ENTERPRISES
Through:
VERSUS
DELHIJAL BOARD
Through:
Petitioner Mr. S.S. Kulshestha, Sr. Adv. with
Mr. A.K. Saxena and Mr. A.K. Behra, Advs. Respondent
Mr. Sumeet Pushkama, Standing Counsel for DJB and Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Adv. and Mr. P.K. Sharma
(AE)
ARB.P. 506/2015
CHAITANYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.S. Kulshestha, Sr. Adv. with Advs.
VERSUS
DELHI JAL BOARD
Through:
(AE)
ARB.P. 507/2015
CHATIANYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Petitioner Advs.
VERSUS
DELHI JAL BOARD
Through:
(AE)
ARB.P. 508/2015
CHATIANYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Petitioner 2015:DHC:10810 o\
Advs.
VERSUS
DELHI JAL BOARD Respondent
Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkama, Standing (AE)
ARB.P. 509/2015
Advs.
VERSUS
(AE)
ARB.P. 510/2015
Advs.
VERSUS
(AE)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
13.10.2015 Despite invocation of the arbitration clause on 30.10.2014 in terms of notice dated 17.09.2014, the Arbitrator was not appointed within 30 days. An Arbitrator is sought to be appointed under Clause
3 ofthe agreement between the parties. The Arbitration Clause is not disputed.
In the circumstances, Mr. Justice B.A. Khan (Mobile NO. 9818000150), a former Judge of this Court and former Chief Justice of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court, is appointed as the Arbitrator.
The fees of the arbitration shall be fixed by learned Arbitrator himself.
These petitions stand disposed off in the above terms. A copy of this order shall be sent to the learned Arbitrator. The parties shall appear before the learned Arbitrator on 29.10.2015.
NA3MIWAZIRI, J OCTOBER 13,2015/acm
JUDGMENT