Amit Kumar v. Union of India & Anr

Delhi High Court · 16 Oct 2015 · 2015:DHC:11406-DB
Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva
W.P.(C) 5706/2015
2015:DHC:11406-DB
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions as withdrawn, directing the reference court to expeditiously decide the pending Section 18 land acquisition reference from 2006.

Full Text
Translation output
$32 to 34 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 5706/2015
AMIT KUMAR . Petitioner
Through: Mr M. Dutta, Advocate
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for Respondent No. 1
Mr Sanjay Kumar, SSO/Legal for DMRC
W.P.(C) 5707/2015 f
It VIJAY KUMAR Petitioner
VERSUS
W.P.(C) 57 10/2015 JAGDISH KUMAR ARORA (NOW DECEASED)
(THR HIS LEGAL HEIRS) Petitioner
VERSUS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA 2015:DHC:11406-DB
16.10.2015 The counter affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain is taken on record.
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these writ petitions. He requests that the reference court may be directed to decide the
Section 18 reference pending before it at an early date. The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
We hope that the reference court shall dispose of Section 18 reference as expeditiously as possible, in as much as, the acquisition is of the year 2006 and possession whereof was taken over in 2006 itself.
AR DURREZ AHMED, J t AEEV SACHDEVA, J OCTOBER 16, 2015 rs
2015:DHC:11406-DB
JUDGMENT