B.R.PIPES PVT. LTD & ORS v. Union of India and Ors

Delhi High Court · 03 Nov 2015 · 2015:DHC:9124-DB
Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva
W.P.(C) 2634/2015
2015:DHC:9124-DB
property petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not effected within five years of the award.

Full Text
Translation output
WP(C) 2634/2015
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 03.11.2015
W.P.(C) 2634/2015 & CM 4709/2015
B.R.PIPES PVT. LTD & ORS. ..... Petitioners
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners : Mr Richa Oberoi For the respondent UOI : Ms Santosh Kohli
For the Respondent DDA : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Mr Arush Bhandari
For the Respondent L&B : Mr Siddharth Panda
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL)

1. By way of this writ petition the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 2013 Act’) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated 2015:DHC:9124-DB under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1894 Act’) and in respect of which Award No.6/2005-06/DC (N-W) dated 12.07.2005 was made, inter alia, in respect of the petitioners’ land comprised in Khasra Nos. 45/2 (1200 Sq. Yds.), 39/7, 8 & 13 (1516 Sq.Yds.) measuring 2716 Sq. Yds. in all in village Pehladpur Bangar, Delhi, shall be deemed to have lapsed.

2. It is an admitted position that neither physical possession of the subject lands has been taken by the land acquiring agency, nor has any compensation been paid to the petitioners. The award was made more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 Act. All the ingredients of section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as interpreted by the Supreme Court and this Court in the following decisions stand satisfied:-

(i) Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr v.

(ii) Union of India and Ors v. Shiv Raj and Ors:

(iii) Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors: Civil Appeal NO. 8700/2013 decided on 10.09.2014; and

(iv) Surender Singh v. Union of India and Ors.:

3. As a result the petitioners are entitled to a declaration that the said acquisition proceedings initiated under the 1894 Act in respect of the subject lands are deemed to have lapsed. It is so declared.

4. The writ petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent. There shall be no order as to costs.

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER 03, 2015 kb