Sirajuddin & Anr v. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee & Anr

Delhi High Court · 04 Nov 2015 · 2015:DHC:11497
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
W.P.(C) 10342/2015
2015:DHC:11497
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions permitting similarly situated petitioners to apply for allotment of shops in Ghazipur Sabzi Mandi and directed their applications be considered on merit when new spaces become available.

Full Text
Translation output
$-42 HIGH COURT OF DELHI 42+ W.P.(C) 10342/2015
SIRAJUDDIN & ANR Petitioners
Through: Mr. Anil Panwar, Ms. Apoorva Srivastava and Mr. Chetan Parkash, Advs.
VERSUS
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE &ANR Respondents
Through: Ms. Latika Choudhury, Adv. AND 43+ W.P.(C) 10343/2015
BHAGAT & ANR Petitioners Advs.
VERSUS
Through: Ms.Latika Choudhuiy, Adv. AND 57+ W.P.(C) 10389/2015
SHAMSUDDIN & ANR Petitioners Advs. W.P.(C) Nos.10342/2015,10343/2015 &10389/2015 Page lof3
2015:DHC:11497
VERSUS
CORAM Through: Ms. LatikaChoudhury, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW
04.11.2015 CM No.25849/2015 in W.P.IC^ No.10342/2015. CM No.25851/2015 in
W.P.(C) No.10343/2015 & CM No.25998/2015 in W.P.fC) No
10389/2015 (all for exemption)
ORDER

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The applications are disposed of. W.P.IO No.10342/2015 & CM No.25848/2015 (for stavL W.P.IC^ No.10343/2015 & CM No.25850/2015 Ifor stavl & W.P.Vct No.10389/2015 & CM No.25997/2015 (for stavl

3. The counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners in these petitions are similarly situated as the petitioners in W.P.(C) Nos.8123/2015, 8126/2015, 8128/2015, 8129/2015, 8130/2015, 8131/2015, 8133/2015, 8134/2015, 8135/2015 & 8140/2015 disposed of vide order dated 15"^ September, 2015 by permitting the petitioners therein to make their applications to the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) for allotment ofthe space / shop in Ghazipur Sabzi Mandi and with a direction that as and when Ghazipur Sabzi Mandi is expanded and new spaces /shops for allotment are available iherein and criteria for allotment thereofhas been laid down / prescribed, the applications ofthe said petitioners be considered on their merit. W.P.(C) Nos.10342/2015,10343/2015 &10389/2015 page2of[3]

2. On the aforesaid representation of the counsel for the petitioners, these petitions are also disposed of in terms of the order dated IS^'' September, 2015 in the writ petitions aforesaid. No costs.

NOVEMBER 04,2015 bs.. W.P.fC) Nos.10342/2015,10343/2015 &10389/2015 RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW, J. Page 3 of[3]